On 8/20/1935, Ron Paul was born. Although Ron Paul did not hold any of the offices which would make him an “official” part of the Presidents Code (such as President, Speaker of the House, etc.), he played a significant part in the code.
The Presidents Code is a parable based upon the name meanings of the U.S. Presidents. Their name meanings tell the story of the Biblical text, from the beginning of creation unto the days of Christ in chronological order. Based upon the premise of this code, it is seen that the very characters of the Presidents, from their personal characters to the events that occurred during their Presidencies reveal in parable form the exact same events of the Biblical narrative of which their name meanings describe. In other words, the history of the United States is displaying a giant parable of the Word of God.
Ron Paul rose to national prominence during the Presidential election of 2008, the same year that Barack Obama was elected to the Presidency. In the Presidents Code, Obama’s Presidency is a portrayal of the days of Jesus Christ. This is a time period in which the American people had grown tired of the corruptness of those in government, corresponding with the time period in the Biblical narrative of Israel flocking to John the Baptist and Jesus Christ who stood against the corruption of the religious leaders (government) of their day. Ron Paul played the role of John the Baptist in this great parable.
Ronald means one who rules by advice or counsel (not a dictator but one who would follow the Constitution). His middle name is Ernest which means someone who is serious or zealous or earnest. In Hebrew one of the words for earnest is דמי קדימה ‘damiy qediymah’ which basically means one who is in the likeness of the ancients (the Founding Fathers). His last name is Paul which means small, or humble (Luke 7:25-28).
John the Baptist came with the Elijah message (Luke 1:17), part of which was a return to the fathers (Malachi 4:6; Matthew 17:10-12). Ron Paul came with a similar message of a return to the Fathers of the United States.
John the Baptist came in opposition of the Pharisees and Sadducees (Matthew 3:5-7) and their corruption of the law of God. The religious leaders of Israel during the days of King Herod were zealous for the law, but this zealousness was not mixed with the true intent of the law which is faith, hope and love. As a result, the Lord sent John the Baptist to prepare the way for the Messiah. So too, the Presidencies of Bush and Obama have been ‘zealous’ for the rule of law but in reality have corrupted the Constitution upon which the law is based.
The message of John the Baptist and the Messiah was one of restoration (Malachi 3:3-4; 4:5-6; Matthew 17:11-12; Mark 9:11-13). Restoration to the true meaning and intent of the Word of God (Luke 1:68-79; 3:3-18). As mentioned previously, the true meaning and intent of God’s law is love.
Love is the basis of which the government of the United States is founded upon. The Founders spoke of the American form of government as being reliant upon the ability of man to govern himself by walking in accordance with the law of God which is summed up in one word, love (Matthew 22:40).
“We have staked the whole future of American civilization, not upon the power of government, far from it. We’ve staked the future of all our political institutions upon our capacity…to sustain ourselves according to the Ten Commandments of God.” {James Madison to the General Assembly of the State of Virginia 1778}
“It is the mutual duty of all to practice Christian forbearance, love, and charity toward each other.” {James Madison -The Proceedings of the Convention of Delegates, Held at the Capitol in the City of Williamsburg, in the Colony of Virginia, on Monday the 6th of May, 1776}
During the days of Christ, the religious leaders of Israel had inherited a zealousness for the law from the Maccabees and saw their religion as that which defined them (1 Maccabees 2:19; 2 Maccabees 8:1; 14:38). The message of John the Baptist and Messiah was not that of religion, but of relationship with God through covenant (Acts 5:20; Luke 3:8; 13:25-29; Matthew 7:21-23; 18:3; 21:31; Luke 6:46).
The Founders of the United States did not envision Americans defining themselves according to political parties. They envisioned Americans defining themselves as freemen, given this liberty by their Creator. They were to be defined by their walk with God.
It is during the days of Barack Obama that an identical political message, led by a Texas Congressman named Ron Paul, was brought forth to the people. A return to the true intent of the Constitution. A return to the Founders who ‘preached’ the ‘Gospel of Liberty.’
In the code, Ron Paul’s role parallels the role of John the Baptist in the Biblical narrative. Amazingly, Ron Paul has been characterized in similar terms as John the Baptist. He has been described as a ‘voice in the wilderness’ for his many years of standing against corruption in Washington despite being, many times, the only person voting against un-constitutional legislation (Isaiah 40:3; Matthew 3:3; Mark 1:3; Luke 3:4; John 1:23). In September 2011, Time magazine published an article on Ron Paul entitled ‘The Prophet’ as many of Dr. Paul’s warnings which were scoffed at in the past, have come true in recent years (Luke 7:28).
The Prophet Elijah came from Gilead and John the Baptist who came in his spirit ministered in this land which was located on the Jordan river (1 Kings 17:1; Matthew 3:5-6; 177:10-13). Gilead was a land of doctors (Jeremiah 8:22). Gilead was famous for healing rosin that dropped from trees which grew near the Jordan river. Ron Paul’s profession before getting into politics was that of a doctor.
Yet another interesting connection is that the name Gilead comes from the ‘witness heap’ which Jacob and Laban set up to certify their covenant (Genesis 31:46-48). In the Presidents Code, this period was portrayed in the Presidency of Grover Cleveland.
Cleveland was considered the ‘last Libertarian President’ who vetoed any legislation passed by Congress which he saw as unconstitutional. This led him to be called the ‘veto president.’ This parallels the political work of Ron Paul who has been given the nickname ‘Dr. No’ for the scores of legislation he voted against which he deemed as unconstitutional. Dr. Paul has also said that Grover Cleveland is the President he most admires most and even had a picture of him in his office.
Just as John the Baptist was sent with a message to return the people to the the law and their fathers (Malachi 4:4-6), Ron Paul was raised up to deliver the message of the returning to Constitution and the ideology of the Founders. Theirs was a message that God is the true source of freedom and the rights upon which this government is based. Ron Paul’s words echo that of the Founders.
“It is God Who gave us life. As He is free, so are those He created in His image. Our rights to life and liberty are inalienable.”
“…My record of public service reflects my reverence for the Natural Rights with which we have been endowed by a loving Creator.”
“We have, as a people, lost our confidence and our understanding of what true liberty is all about and where it comes from …It doesn’t come from the government. Our liberties come from our Creator.”
“There is only one kind of freedom and that’s individual liberty. Our lives come from our creator and our liberty comes from our creator. It has nothing to do with government granting it.”
Just as the message of Barack Obama resonated in the hearts of many Americans, so too did the message of Ron Paul. His message was so influential that a movement has been formed around it, dubbed the ‘Ron Paul Revolution.’ This movement has been especially influential amongst the youth of America. Former White House correspondent, Juan Williams, described the movement as bringing about a ‘political age of Republican Ron Paul.’ This “political age of Ron Paul” will eventually lead to a new era in American politics (6th Party System) which will coincide with the days of the Apostles.
This ‘Ron Paul Revolution’ or ‘Liberty movement’ corresponds with the message of Jesus and John the Baptist and their disciples who carried forth the Gospel even after they were gone. What was their message? A return to the ‘faith once delivered to the saints’ (Jude 1:3), walking in the old paths wherein is the good way (Jeremiah 6:16; Matthew 11:28-29). This corresponds with the message of returning to the message of the Founders of this country, proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence.
The Gospel is a message of reconciliation between God and man through Jesus Christ where man is returned to his original state in the Garden (1 Corinthians 15:47-49; Romans 5:12-21), walking in the true intent of the law, the perfect law of liberty (John 8:31-32; Isaiah 8:16; Psalm 119:42-45; James 1:25; 2:10-12; Galatians 5:1, 13-14; 2 Corinthians 3:17), working out ones salvation with fear and trembling (Philippians 2:13). These concepts are paralleled in Ron Paul’s message of individual liberty. At one debate, when asked how he would use the ‘bully pulpit’ of the Presidency if elected, Ron Paul said he would use it to continue spreading the ‘Gospel of Liberty.’
This Gospel message of freedom in Christ is the source upon which the Founders of this government relied.
“…The right to freedom being the gift of God Almighty…’The Rights of the Colonists as Christians’…may be best understood by reading and carefully studying the institutes of the great Law Giver and Head of the Christian Church, which are to be found clearly written and promulgated in the New Testament.” {Samuel Adams – Rights of the Colonists}
Ron Paul ran for President in 2008 and 2012 bringing a message which contradicted the establishment, just as John the Baptist and Jesus Christ contradicted the establishment of their days. Dr. Paul brought forth a message of returning to the Constitution and Bill of Rights which is based upon the unalienable rights given to man by his Creator. This is the ‘natural law’ which was defined by John Locke as the Law of God.
“…the Law of Nature stands as an Eternal Rule to all Men, Legislators as well as others. The Rules that they make for other Men’s Actions, must, as well as their own, and other Men’s Actions, be conformable to the Law of Nature, i.e. to the Will of God.” {John Locke – Of Civil Government}
As mentioned before, the last two Presidencies have seen open violations of these rights in the name of security just as the religious leaders of the Second Temple corrupted the Word of God in the name of security. The leaders of the nation set up ‘fences’ around the law to protect the people from going astray as they had done during the days of the First Temple. However, it was these fences that were the foundation of the ‘oral law’ which ended up corrupting the law of God (Matthew 15:2; Mark 7:8; 1 Peter 1:18; Galatians 1:1).
Ron Paul came with a message warning of the corruption of the Federal Reserve which corresponds with the attack on the moneychangers by Jesus (John 2:14-17; Matthew 21:12). In the code this Federal Reserve system and fiat currency depicts the contrast between God and Mammon (Luke 16:13-15; Matthew 6:19-24).
The end of the gold standard came about in 1971 and created a nearly worldwide fiat money system in which bankers or money changers would have unlimited power to manipulate the economy. ‘Fiat’ comes from the Latin word ‘fiat’ which means ‘it shall be.’ This comes from the Hebrew word היה ‘hayah’ which means ‘to be.’ For the United States, it literally means the chairman of the Federal Reserve can say ‘let it be’ and it happens.
היה ‘hayah’ means ‘to be’ as in ‘I AM’ which is speaking of God Himself (Exodus 3:14). The ability of the Federal Reserve to say ‘let it be’ and it comes to pass is a power that only God should have. Here we see in the Federal Reserve a parable of the two tables of which the Apostle Paul spoke of (1 Corinthians 10:21).
Ron Paul has staunchly opposed the wars of President Bush which were declared without approval of Congress in violation of the Constitution. He has suggested a foreign policy based upon the Golden Rule. In the code, the War on Terror is associated with the neo-conservative idea of American Exceptionalism which is a corrupted view of a ‘shining city on a hill.’ Dr. Paul’s foreign policy lines up with the true ideals of a ‘shining city upon a hill’ which is showing forth the love of God by one’s actions which leads to others joining in the same (Matthew 5:14-16; John 5:35; Philippians 2:15).
In his Inaugural address Barack Obama, who also opposed the wars of President Bush, displayed this ‘shining city on a hill’ concept as being in contradiction to the Neo-Conservative definition.
“As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals. Our Founding Fathers, faced with perils that we can scarcely imagine, drafted a charter to assure the rule of law and the rights of man — a charter expanded by the blood of generations. Those ideals still light the world, and we will not give them up for expedience sake.”
The Neo-Conservative method of spreading the ‘gospel’ of liberty is by force.
This forced spread of Democracy to other nations of the world is justified under the doctrine of ‘American Exceptionalism.’ This idea is based upon America’s goodness seen in its form of government which is based upon rights given by a Creator. The concept of a ‘shining city upon a hill.’ The problem with the usage by the Neo-Conservative movement is that the concept of a shining city upon a hill has always been one of setting an example for others to follow, not forcing American ideals upon them by warfare.
Both the Pharisees and Sadducees believed that the Messiah would come to save Israel by force, destroying their enemies through war and setting up Israel as the head of the nations. This is depicted by the Neocon idea that the American empire will spread by the use of its military power and thus lead the peoples of the world into freedom. Contrariwise, Jesus Christ came preaching the Gospel of love and repentance towards God. The message that the Kingdom of God begins within the heart of man (Luke 17:21) and would spread by peace, not violence (Mark 16:15; Luke 4:18; Romans 10:15; Ephesians 6:15).
The neoconservative’s corrupted view of American Exceptionalism is further seen in the belief of Jews during the Second Temple period that they were somehow better, or more exceptional, than other peoples because they were the seed of Abraham (John 8:33). This belief was rebuked by John the Baptist.
Matthew 3:9 And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.
The message of Jesus was that the actions of believers, walking in the love of the Word of God is what makes them the shining city upon a hill.
John 8:39 They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham’s children, ye would do the works of Abraham.
Matthew 5:14 Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on an hill cannot be hid.
Matthew 5:15 Neither do men light a candle, and put it under a bushel, but on a candlestick; and it giveth light unto all that are in the house.
Matthew 5:16 Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven.
Scripture declares this light as the Word of God (Proverbs 6:23; Psalm 119:105), who became flesh and dwelt among us (Isaiah 9:2; John 1:9; 8:12; 9:5; 12:46). During the second Temple period, Israel had come to boast that they were this light, forgetting that it is not they, but the Word of God that shines as light into the world (Romans 2:17-29). This corrupted view is seen in George W. Bush’s 2002 speech on the anniversary of September 11th where he declared the cause of America as the hope of all mankind, borrowing a phrase from John Chapter 1 which is referring to the Word of God.
“Tomorrow is September the 12th. A milestone is passed, and a mission goes on. Be confident. Our country is strong. And our cause is even larger than our country. Ours is the cause of human dignity; freedom guided by conscience and guarded by peace. This ideal of America is the hope of all mankind. That hope drew millions to this harbor. That hope still lights our way. And the light shines in the darkness. And the darkness will not overcome it.”
‘And the light shines in the darkness. And the darkness will not overcome it.’ The Scripture says this is referring to Jesus Christ.
John 1:4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
John 1:5 And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.
This portion of Scripture in the book of John declares that Jesus is the Word made flesh, who was in the beginning with God (John 1:1-3). This Word in the beginning corresponds with the Declaration of Independence as true independence comes from the Word of God who is Messiah (John 8:31-32).
The problem with the Bush Doctrine is that many of the means which were instituted to spread Democracy to other nations were based in unconstitutional actions. The right message was being put forth, but the means by which it was to be instituted was corrupted. This was the problem with Israel during the days of King Herod.
The religious leaders of Israel during the days of King Herod were zealous for the law, but this zealousness was not mixed with the true intent of the law which is faith, hope and love (1 Corinthians 13:13). As a result, God sent John the Baptist to prepare the way for the Messiah (Matthew 3:1,3; 11:10; Luke 3:4; 7:27). The message of John the Baptist and the Messiah was one of restoration (Malachi 3:3-4; 4:5-6; Matthew 17:11-12; Mark 9:11-13). Restoration to the true meaning and intent of the Word of God (Luke 1:68-79; 3:3-18).
The religious leaders of Israel had inherited a zealousness for the law from the Maccabees and saw their religion as that which defined them (1 Maccabees 2:19; 2 Maccabees 8:1; 14:38). The message of John the Baptist and Messiah was not that of religion, but of relationship with God through covenant (Acts 5:20; Luke 3:8; 13:25-29; Matthew 7:21-23; 18:3; 21:31; Luke 6:46).
The religion which was set up by the leaders of Israel became known as the tradition of the elders (Matthew 15:3), a set of guidelines which the nation was to follow. In and of itself this is not a negative thing but the problem is that the people exalted their traditions above the Word of God. As a result, this religiosity became in reality, lawlessness (John 7:19; Matthew 23:28; Galatians 6:13).
Ron Paul and the 6th Party system
The Ron Paul Revolution led to the forming of the ‘Tea Party.’ The foundations of the Tea Party trace back to December 2007 when Ron Paul supporters raised a record 6.5 million dollars in a single day in a ‘money bomb’ which was called the ‘Boston Tea Party 07.’ It was based upon the message of Ron Paul that the Tea Party formed, advocating a strict adherence to the U.S. Constitution.
However, the Tea Party in many ways departed from the message of Ron Paul and joined forces with the Republican party of whom Dr. Paul had chastised in 2008 as having gone astray from the principles of the Constitution. The Tea Party led the Republican party to landslide victories in the 2010 midterm elections resulting in a regain of control in the House of Representatives in 2011 and later the Senate in 2015.
This division between followers of Ron Paul and those who would rally behind politicians like Sarah Palin depict the division between those who followed Messiah and those who followed Him not yet proclaimed His name (Luke 9:49-50; Mark 9:38-40). The primary difference between the ‘Paulites’ and the ‘Palinites’ is foreign policy. Ron Paul preached the message of non-interventionism which was advocated by Washington and Jefferson. Sarah Palin was an advocate of a foreign policy which is more in line with the Neo-Conservative movement and the concept of ‘American Exceptionalism.’ Again, this view is a corruption of the concept of a ‘shining city upon a hill.’
Both the Pharisees and Sadducees believed that the Messiah would come to save Israel by force, destroying their enemies through war and setting up Israel as the head of the nations. However, Jesus Christ came preaching the Gospel of love and repentance towards God. The message that the Kingdom of God begins within the heart of man (Luke 17:21) and would spread by peace, not violence (Mark 16:15; Luke 4:18; Romans 10:15; Ephesians 6:15). This is how the Light of God’s Word would be shone to the nations, not through military might (Matthew 5:14-16; Philippians 2:15). This dichotomy lines up with the two ‘factions’ of the Tea Party movement.
As mentioned before, the large crowds and the almost ‘messianic fervor’ which was seen for Barack Obama in 2008, and Ron Paul in 2012 are indicative of the state of the people in this country. In 2016 this was seen with Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders. The people were desperate for change. They had grown exceedingly tired of the corruption seen in their government. This was seen during the days of Messiah as well. The corruption of the religious leaders was seen by many in the nation so they flocked to John the Baptist and later to Jesus Christ.
This movement continued into the days of the Apostles recorded in the book of Acts where God’s dealings with His people began to change. The focus of believers would change from the Temple system and a desire to rule in the Promised land, to spreading the Gospel of salvation to all of mankind. This corresponds with the political change which is occurring in America.
This ‘dispensation’ which has been named the ‘Church Age’ by theologians would be paralleled in our days in a Sixth Party System. It is too early to give a solid prediction but another ‘Party System’ is due to occur in the near future. The rise of “anti-establishment” candidates in 2016 and the election of Donald Trump is indicative of this change.
As mentioned before, the Sadducees were the ‘conservative’ party during the Second Temple period. They disappeared from the scene after the fall of the Temple, leaving only the Pharisees and a new ‘sect’ called Christians.
Different periods or eras in our nation’s political history have been divided up into what are called ‘Party Systems.’ In the Presidents Code, these Party Systems correspond with dispensations in the Biblical narrative.
For clarity, here is a quick summary. The First Party System of the Federalists and Democrat-Republicans displayed the time period of the Garden of Eden. This era was the time period of the Founders, Washington – Monroe.
The Second Party System of the Democrats and Whigs depicted the time period of Adam in exile through the days of Noah until the time of Abraham. This era came about during the “second generation” of Americans and was dominated by Andrew Jackson and his supporters.
The Third Party system began with the days of Abraham Lincoln and the formation of the Republican party which corresponds with the time period in Scripture of Abraham and the covenant between God and his seed. This was the time period of the Civil War and the Reconstruction of America after the war. This period parallels the lives of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
The Fourth Party System came about during the Presidencies of Grover Cleveland and William McKinley and lasted until the days of Franklin Roosevelt. This time period corresponded with the days of Joseph and Israel in the land of Egypt.
We are currently in the Fifth Party System which began during the days of Franklin Roosevelt and corresponds with the ‘dispensation’ of Moses, the Old Covenant and the giving of the Law. There have been a number of significant changes during this era, called ‘political re-alignments’ but the FDR style government has continued to this day.
The next ‘dispensation’ in the Scriptures is the time period of the Apostles and the New Covenant where the focus of God’s dealings with His people transitions from the Old Covenant, the Temple system and living in the Promised Land to the dispensation of the New Testament and the spreading of the Gospel to the four corners of the world. This sixth party system seems to have begun in Obama’s Presidency.
Barack Obama and Ron Paul were the initial catalysts in bringing about this new era. The large crowds and the almost ‘messianic fervor’ which was seen for Barack Obama in 2008, and Ron Paul in 2012 are indicative of the state of the people in this country. This fervor has transitioned today to Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders. The people are desperate for change. They are tired of the corruption seen in their government. This was seen during the days of Messiah as well. The corruption of the religious leaders was seen by many in the nation so they flocked to John the Baptist (Matthew 3:5; Mark 1:5; Luke 3:7) and later to Jesus Christ (Matthew 4:25; 5:1; 8:1; 12:15; 15:30; 21:9; Luke 5:15; 14:25).
2012 Election
The 2012 Election saw President Barack Obama running for re-election against Republican candidate Mitt Romney. Either candidate would have continued the “Presidents Code” but there are a few events which occurred which pointed to President Obama being re-elected. We will discuss those events at the end of this post. First, lets look at the candidates and see how their elections would continue the “code”.
In the code, President Obama being re-elected would continue the storyline of the days of Jesus Christ. If Mitt Romney would have been elected, the same period would have been displayed, albeit with a focus on the religious leaders of the time. Mitt Romney’s name meaning is pointing to the corrupt leadership in Israel during the days of Christ. His name links very strongly to King Herod. The Presidency of George W. Bush depicted the days of corrupt leadership in Israel during the Second Temple period as well. It is no surprise then that Mitt Romney associated himself with many of the same advisors as President Bush. His top advisors, including those on foreign policy, the economy and education were primarily from the Bush administration. This election then was a replay of the two choices in 2008 between Obama and John McCain.
The 2008 election saw the choice between Barack Obama and John McCain. John McCain’s name meaning pointed to the wicked leadership of Israel in the Second Temple period. Like Romney, McCain was very similar in policy to George W. Bush. Many even joked that a McCain Presidency would be a third term of George W. Bush.
John means camp of the LORD, referring to Israel. McCain means the son of Cain, speaking of the wicked leaders of Israel during the days spoken of in the New Testament writings (John 8:44; Matthew 23:15; 1 John 3:12).
Now, let us move on to Mitt Romney’s name meaning.
Mitt Romney
Mitt Romney reflected the time period of the scribes and Pharisees, Herod and Pilate who sought to usurp the headship of Messiah (Psalm 2 and Acts 4:27).
Willard, is Romney’s real first name. It is a Germanic name derived from the elements ‘wil’ which means will or desire and ‘hard’ which means hardy or cruel. A strong, hard will. Jesus, referring back to the words of Isaiah, applied this to the religious leaders who rejected Him. Their unrepentant heart kept their hearts far from Him (Isaiah 29:10-13; 6:9-10; Matthew 15:7-9; Mark 7:6-13). Cruelty is also a characteristic of these false shepherds of Israel (Ezekiel 34:4; Isaiah 56:11).
A mitt is a glove that fits on either hand. The word ‘mitt’ comes from the Middle English ‘myten’ which means the middle or center. This corresponds with Romney’s character of being a ‘flip-flopper’ who changed his mind on many major issues throughout his political career. This is also pointing to the Pharisees who attempted to serve two masters, God and mammon (Luke 16:13-14; 20:47; Matthew 23:14).
Romney is of Old Welsh origin and refers to a winding, meandering river. Again, this depicts the changing or meandering positions of Romney during his political life. His name is a portrayal of a double minded man who is unstable in all his ways (James 1:8).
The leadership of Israel displays the “doublemindedness” in their hypocrisy (Matthew 6:2,5; 15:7-9; 22:18; 23:13-15, 23-29; Mark 7:6; Luke 11:44; 12:1; Galatians 2:13).
Mat 23:28 Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity.
Mitt Romney’s character fit that of Herod in numerous ways. Romney is the first Mormon to obtain the nomination for President from the Republican or Democratic parties. This is significant as his Mormon faith corresponds in compelling ways to King Herod.
It is not the purpose of this article to go into a condemnatory treatise on the Mormon faith. It is important to note however, that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints proclaims to be a Christian church, yet has separated itself from mainstream Christendom. This corresponds to Herod who, although set up as King of the Jews, was not a Jew but an Edomite.
This is interesting to note as Herod came from an Edomite family that converted to Judaism after a Maccabee High Priest John Hyrcanus conquered the region of Idumea in around 130BC. He required all Edomites to obey Jewish law or leave. Most converted to Judaism and were circumcised. Mitt Romney was known for his liberal past and his “flip-flopping” where he eventually “converted” to the Neo-Con wing of the Republican party.
Continuing with the theme of separation from the mainstream is Former Mormon President and ‘prophet’ Gordon B. Hinckley who went so far as to say that the Jesus of Mormonism is different from the Jesus of mainstream Christianity.
The LDS Church News, in June 1998, reported the following:
“In bearing testimony of Jesus Christ, President Hinckley spoke of those outside the Church who say Latter-day Saints ‘do not believe in the traditional Christ. No, I don’t. The traditional Christ of whom they speak is not the Christ of whom I speak. For the Christ of whom I speak has been revealed in this the Dispensation of the Fulness of Times’”
However, Hinckley maintained he is a Christian.
“Am I Christian?” Hinckley asked rhetorically, “Of course I am. I believe in Christ. I talk of Christ. I pray through Christ. I’m trying to follow Him and live His gospel in my life”.
In 37 BC Marc Antony set up Herod as king of the Jews, yet in reality he was an Edomite. He was a false king. Herod knew of his illegitimacy which is why he attempted to kill Jesus when He was born as Jesus was the true King of Israel (Matthew 2:1-18).
Another important connection to note between Mitt Romney and King Herod is the ‘god-man’ concept. Mormons are known for their belief that they will become gods. Here a few examples from Mormon writings which proclaim this doctrine of man becoming god.
Joseph Smith, the Founder of the Mormon religion said:
“God himself was once as we are now, and is an exalted Man, and sits enthroned in yonder heavens. That is the great secret…Here, then, is eternal life—to know the only wise and true God; and you have got to learn how to be Gods yourselves, and to be kings and priests to God, the same as all Gods have done before you.” {Journal of Discourses 6}
The fifth LDS prophet Lorenzo Snow said in 1840, “As man is, God once was; as God is, man may become.”
Brigham Young also said, “The Lord created you and me for the purpose of becoming Gods like Himself” (Journal Of Discourses 3:93).
This idea of man being a god corresponds with a later Herod who was also proclaimed as such (Acts 12:21-22).
Another link between Herod and Mitt Romney is the beheading of John the Baptist (Matthew 14:10). The relationship was seen in the 2012 Republican primaries between Mitt Romney and Ron Paul. Ron Paul is a portrayal of John the Baptist.
In the 2012 race for President there were numerous parallels between Herod’s relationship with John the Baptist and Mitt Romney’s relationship with Ron Paul.
Scripture declares that Herod imprisoned John the Baptist and wanted him killed but would not do so openly because of fear (Matthew 14:5). Eventually, on his birthday he did have John beheaded at the behest of his wife (Matthew 14:6-11). Romney’s campaign never went on a full scale attack against Ron Paul during the 2012 campaign but during the Republican convention, or it could be said Romney’s ‘birthday,’ his true intentions were seen.
In the 2012 primaries, Mitt Romney made a conscious effort not to attack Ron Paul openly because, presumably, he feared him and the following he had attained.
A good example of why Romney feared Dr. Paul is seen in the 2008 primaries, Ron Paul had made a mockery of Mitt Romney’s response to a foreign policy question asked by Chris Matthews during a debate. Matthews asked:
“If you were President of the United States, would you need to go to Congress to get authorization to take military action against Iran’s nuclear facilities?”
Romney responded:
“Uh, you sit down with your attorneys to tell you what you have to do. But obviously the President of the United States has to do what is in the best interest of the United States to protect us against a potential threat. The President did that as he was planning to move into Iraq and received the authorization of Congress…”
Matthews interrupted with the question, “did he need it?”
“Uh, you know we are gonna let the lawyers sort out what he needed to do and what he didn’t need to do, but certainly what you want to do is have the agreement of all the people in leadership of our government as well as our friends around the world where the circumstances are available…”
Ron Paul was asked the same question, “do you believe the President needs authorization from Congress to attack strategic targets in Iran?”
“Absolutely. This idea of going and talking to attorneys totally baffles me. Why don’t we just open up the Constitution and read it? You’re not allowed to go war without a declaration of war!”
Ron Paul was referring to Article One, Section Eight of the Constitution which says that only Congress is given the power to declare war. The last time that Congress formally declared war was in 1941 after Pearl Harbor was attacked. This means that since World War II, none of the wars fought by the United States have been authorized by the Constitution.
In 1973, Congress passed the War Powers Resolution to prevent un-constitutional wars. However, nearly every President since Gerald Ford has openly defied these War Powers Resolutions. In the “Presidents Code” this displays the theme of kings ruling over Israel unto the the time of Caesar ruling over Israel.
In the 2012 Primaries, Romney avoided the same mistakes by referring to Ron Paul as the ‘constitutionalist.’ During a debate, Romney was asked by George Stephanopoulos if states had the right to ban contraception.
” I don’t know of any candidate that wants to do so, you’re asking could it constitutionally be done? We can ask our constitutionalist here [gesturing to Ron Paul]”
In the 2012 Primaries, the only person left between Mitt Romney and the nomination was Ron Paul. Through a strong grassroots movement, Ron Paul had amassed an estimated 500 or more delegates and won the majority of delegates in more than 5 states which would have given him at least a speaking spot at the Convention. There were even rumors of numerous ‘stealth’ delegates which would have voted for Ron Paul to cause a brokered convention. While a brokered convention was unlikely, the fear of chaos at the convention was foreseen by the Romney campaign and the Republican party.
Although Mitt Romney had been already been declared the presumptive nominee, these delegates could have caused an embarrassing situation to occur on the floor of the Republican convention where Romney would not have appeared as having the entire Republican party behind him. Perception is important in politics and the Republican party did not want to have Romney appear weak as he ran against an incumbent President.
To prevent this embarrassment, numerous rule changes were passed on the convention floor which caused much controversy. After taking a floor vote on the new rules, there was an obvious audible split between the ‘ayes’ and the ‘nays’ with some observers saying the ‘nays’ had the majority, but Speaker John Boehner proclaimed that the ‘ayes have it’ leading to a plethora of boos coming from the crowd. This is significant as after the clear display of opposing votes, Republican Party protocol declares that a roll call vote should have been made. The next day it came out why that roll call was not made. Speaker Boehner was reading off of a teleprompter and disregarded completely the delegates who opposed the new rules.
This is important to note as it reveals that the Republican party had already decided to pass the new rules regardless of any opposition on the floor.
The new rules that were passed bound delegates to the winner of the primary vote for each state. For instance, Ron Paul had the majority of delegates in states like Iowa and Maine but due to the new rules, these delegates would not be allowed to vote for Paul at the convention because he didn’t win the Primary vote. This unjust rule change even caused the Maine delegates to walk out in protest.
During the first day of the convention, Ron Paul made an appearance on the floor which caused a resounding round of applause and chants of ‘Let him speak.’ Days before the convention Ron Paul gave an interview with the New York Times and said that the convention organizers offered him a speaking role, but only if he gave a ‘full-fledged endorsement’ of Mitt Romney and agreed to have his remarks pre-approved. Ron Paul said ‘it wouldn’t be my speech’ and that to compromise ‘would undo everything I’ve done in the last 30 years.” Consequently, Dr. Paul did not endorse Mitt Romney and was not given a speaking spot at the Republican Convention. However, the weekend before the ‘official’ convention a Ron Paul rally was held where he got to speak for over an hour to a sold out crowd of nearly 10,000 people.
These things are mentioned to give a small picture of how Mitt Romney obtained the Republican nomination and show how Ron Paul was unfairly treated. Michael Alford documents this in more detail in his book “Swindled: How the GOP Cheated Ron Paul and Lost Themselves the Election”.
In essence, the 2012 Republican primaries were a display of John the Baptist being imprisoned. The 2012 Republican Convention was a display of Herod beheading John. During the convention, Ron Paul adviser Doug Wead, spoke of Mitt Romney threatening Ron Paul during the 2012 primaries. Wead said that Romney threatened Ron Paul with a ‘PR A Bomb’ using his massive amounts of money to ‘destroy the name Ron Paul forever.’ Many had wondered why the two did not debate each other in the Spring of 2012 after the rest of the Presidential candidates dropped out of the race and why Ron Paul did not go on the attack against Romney during the campaign. This response by Wead, seemed to answer these questions.
These threats by Romney were a type of binding of Ron Paul, corresponding with the imprisonment of John the Baptist. Televised debates between Ron Paul and Mitt Romney would have clearly displayed their differences and brought forth Dr. Paul’s message to a larger audience. A speaking spot at the Republican convention would have given Ron Paul even more influence as a large majority of Americans do not pay attention to Presidential races until the conventions. The actions of the Republican party at their convention and their refusal to allow Dr. Paul to speak at the convention, corresponds with the beheading of John the Baptist.
There is a lot more to this story but this should suffice for now to display the Herod – John the Baptist; Mitt Romney – Ron Paul parallel. These events surrounding Ron Paul and the unjust actions by the Republican party turned out to play a significant role in the shaping of America’s politics in the years to come. This was one of the catalysts driving America into a 6th party system.
Sixth Party System
Based upon the ‘code’ it appears that America is due to have a major change in its politics. A new ‘era’ is coming forth. The beginnings of this change began with the rise of ‘outsider’ candidates rising to prominence. The time period of Obama to Trump, point to this major change in American, and consequently, world politics.
Currently, we are seeing a transition in the political scene of America as well. A large majority of Americans are fed up with the politicians and the corruption seen in the two party system. Polls that have been run from 2010 to today speak of 60-80% of Americans wanting a different party to choose from. This corresponds with the time period of John the Baptist, Jesus Christ and His Apostles as they became the third major ‘party’ or sect in Israel.
In the “code,” it seems the Pharisees correspond with the Democratic party of today and the Sadducees correspond with the Republican party. Historians even speak of Pharisees as the “Liberals” and Sadducees as the “Conservatives” of their time. As of yet, a major third party corresponding with the Apostles has not yet risen to power in the country but the ‘Liberty movement’ led by Ron Paul began pushing the nation in that direction. In the code, Ron Paul portrays John the Baptist. There are multiple minor parties (“third parties”) already in the country, the major one being the Libertarian party.
Initially, it appeared that the “Liberty movement” led by Ron Paul would be the catalyst in pushing this nation into a new era but the 2016 election has shown that this is not turning out to be the fullness of this move. The primary theme of the 2016 election has been about establishment candidates versus anti-establishment candidates with the support of anti-establishment candidates rising to an historical level.
The large crowds and the almost ‘messianic fervor’ which was seen for Barack Obama in 2008, and Ron Paul in 2012 are indicative of the state of the people in the country. This fervor transitioned in 2016 to Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders and then the America First movement led by Trump. The people are desperate for change. They are tired of the corruption seen in their government. This was seen during the days of Messiah as well. The corruption of the religious leaders was seen by many in the nation so they flocked to John the Baptist (Matthew 3:5; Mark 1:5; Luke 3:7) and later to Jesus Christ (Matthew 4:25; 5:1; 8:1; 12:15; 15:30; 21:9; Luke 5:15; 14:25). During that time period some fled to the wilderness forming the Essene sect.
This movement continued into the days of the Apostles recorded in the book of Acts where God’s dealings with His people began to change. The focus of believers would change from the Temple system and a desire to rule in the Promised land, to spreading the Gospel of salvation to all of mankind (Acts 1:6-8). This corresponds with the political change which is occurring in America.
This ‘dispensation’ which has been named the ‘Church Age’ by theologians would be paralleled in our days in a Sixth Party System. It is too early to give a solid prediction but another ‘Party System’ is certainly forming. Time will tell how this new Era plays out but if it follows the code a major, perhaps largest, change in American history will occur.
As mentioned before, the Sadducees were the ‘conservative’ party during the Second Temple period. They disappeared from the scene after the fall of the Temple, leaving only the Pharisees and a new ‘sect’ called Christians. Does this mean the Republican party of today will disappear or will it be changed so much that it will not be recognizable to the Republican party of Lincoln, Roosevelt and Reagan?
The Apostles brought great change to Israel and the ‘political’ scene of the time. After Jesus rose from the grave and the Apostles began preaching the Gospel, many of the Pharisees and Sadducees began following the Apostles (Acts 2:41-42, 46; 4:4; 5:14; 6:7) but they were not considered a different ‘sect,’ until later (Acts 11:26; 24:5; 28:22).
It is too early to predict how this will play out in the ‘code’ of American politics but it is becoming clear that the ‘anti-establishment’ movement of the 2016 election is significantly pushing America into a new era.
Through the Jews’ rejection of Christ (Matthew 21:42-44; Mark 12:10-11; Luke 20:16-19; Acts :11-12), Jesus said He would take their nation away from them and give them to another nation (Matthew 21:28-41; Mark 12:1-9; Luke 20:9-16). This was a transfer from the Pharisees and Sadducees to Christians. It was a transfer from the Old Covenant and Temple system to the New Covenant and the spreading of the Gospel to the world.
In the ‘code,’ Pharisees correspond with Democrats and Sadducees correspond to the Republicans. In history, after the fall of the Temple, the Pharisees continued and founded Rabbinic Judaism. The Sadducees disappeared from history after the fall of the Temple as they held the leadership of the priesthood. With the end of the Temple system, the Sadducee party ended as well.
In the code, the temples are displayed in the various attempts by American Presidents to broker peace agreements between Israel and the Palestinians. Will this new era mean America’s dealings with Israel and the Palestinians is going to change?
These temples are strongly linked to both Bush Presidencies. Will this change signal an end of the Bush dynasty in American politics?
As of the “re-write” of this article in 2025, a change towards view of the state of Israel in America is changing. Pro versus anti-Israel sentiment is a major divide in American politics, especially within the America First camp. This will be discussed in more detail in Trump’s parables.
In the New Covenant era, the physical temple was no longer the focus (John 4:21-24) as believers were now considered the temple of God (1 Corinthians 3:9, 16; Ephesians 2:18-22; 1 Peter 2:5-9). Jesus is the cornerstone of this temple (Isaiah 28:16; 8:14-20; Psalm 118:22-23), which the Pharisees and Sadducees rejected. He was an offense to both houses (Isaiah 8:14-15) so we should expect to see a President or Presidents in the future who offend both Democrats and Republicans.
This is being displayed by Trump currently. The establishment of both parties have rejected him while he’s been supported by the America First movement. Yet, due to issues like the “Epstein files” some within the America First camp have began to turn against him as well.
Believers from the Pharisees and from the Sadducees left their ‘parties’ to join the Christians while both sects persecuted Christians in the early years (Acts 5:33, 40; 8:1; 11:19). After the Temple was destroyed, Pharisees (Rabbinic Jews) greatly persecuted Christians and set up Christians to be even more greatly persecuted by Rome. It was not until the time period of Constantine that the Church escaped this great period of persecution.
In conjunction with the Liberty and ‘anti-establishment’ movements pushing the country in the direction of a ‘Sixth Party System’ is the discussion about the monetary system and the role of the Federal Reserve. These issues have been raised by Ron Paul and pushed by the ‘Liberty movement’ which has formed around him. In the summer of 2012, Ron Paul’s ‘Audit the Fed’ bill passed in the House of Representatives by a vote of 327-98 displaying the influence that the Liberty movement is making in the nation’s political scene.
In 2016, Ron Paul’s son Rand put forth an ‘Audit the Fed’ bill in the Senate but it was blocked. This is further seen in the leading ‘anti-establishment’ candidates in the 2016 election. Donald Trump has claimed that he will audit the Federal Reserve if elected President and Bernie Sanders has already introduced a bill in the Senate to bring forth transparency of the Federal Reserve.
In 2025, Trump has mentioned change in the monetary system is to be expected with perhaps bitcoin playing a major role.
Throughout history, changes in the Party Systems and ‘political realignments’ have been associated with changes in the monetary system of the United States.
The coming new era in American politics will more than likely see a significant change in the economic system of America.
Controversy over the First National Bank gave rise to the First Party System picturing the time period of the Garden of Eden. In the ‘code,’ the National Bank is strongly associated with the serpent and the tree of knowledge of good and evil which led to the exile of Adam out of the Garden.
The National Bank was first established in 1791 during George Washington‘s Presidency, strongly pushed by Alexander Hamilton. Washington’s Presidency was a picture of the Father planting a Garden in Eden. This establishment of the National Bank displays the tree of knowledge of good and evil being placed in the Garden in the beginning, with command by God to Adam not to partake of its fruit (Genesis 2:9, 17). The Bank’s Charter expired in 1811 but in 1816 the Second Bank of the United States was re-instituted by James Madison with a new charter which would last until 1836.
Thomas Jefferson‘s Presidency pictured the fall of Adam and Eve in the Garden due to the deception of the serpent. Jefferson was the first Secretary of State in George Washington’s cabinet but they had a fall out over fiscal policy. Jefferson opposed Alexander Hamilton’s policies which eventually led to Jefferson voluntarily leaving Washington’s cabinet. Hard feelings ensued between Jefferson and Washington and they never spoke again. This portrays an interesting connection to the separation of the adversary from the Holy Mountain of God (Ezekiel 28:12-19) as Washington’s parable displays God.
Amazingly, money which caused their separation, is strongly linked to the tree of knowledge of good and evil. This is an in depth subject so for brevity’s sake I will only give a few examples. First is seen in the symbol of the dollar ($) which traces back to the ancient imagery of a serpent in a tree. Scripture also declares that the love of money is the root of all evil (1 Timothy 6:10) also tracing back to the tree of knowledge of good and evil where the first sin occurred (Romans 5:12).
The Bank’s Charter expired in 1811 but in 1816 the Second Bank of the United States was re-instituted by James Madison with a new charter which would last until 1836. Andrew Jackson became President in 1832 and was able to gain enough support to veto the recharter bill and “destroy” the bank by 1833, diverting all revenue into private banks. It is interesting to note that political cartoons which supported Jackson portrayed the bank as a serpent with the devil as its president. This fits in line with the bank being a portrayal of the tree of knowledge.
Debt is associated with the serpent. This is seen in the Hebrew word לוה ‘lavah’ which means to be ‘joined’ as the borrower is joined to the lender. לוה is also the root of the word ‘leviathan’ or the dragon spoken of in Scripture (Isaiah 27:1). This is also seen in another Hebrew word for debt which is נשא ‘nasha’ which means both ‘debt’ and ‘deceive.’ The connection here to the serpent in Genesis 3 is clear.
The Second Party System formed as a result of Andrew Jackson and the controversy of the election of 1824 where Jackson won both the popular and electoral vote but did not have the majority needed to gain the Presidency. The decision on who would become President went to the House of Representatives where Henry Clay pushed for the election of John Quincy Adams. Clay was the ‘author’ of the ‘American System’ which included a National Bank of which Jackson adamantly opposed. The Democratic party formed around Andrew Jackson and the Whig party formed around Clay and Adams. This led to the Second Party System which pictured the days of Adam in exile from the Garden to the days of Abraham.
Andrew Jackson pictured the battle between the Seed of the woman and the seed of the serpent. Jackson’s victory over the National Bank pictured in parable form, mankind’s victory over sin brought forth by the tree of knowledge through the Seed of the woman. It is interesting that opposition to the National Bank of our day, the Federal Reserve, is coming forth through Ron Paul and the Liberty movement as our days correspond to the time period of the days of John the Baptist and Jesus Christ, the Seed of the woman.
The Third Party System arose as a result of the issue of slavery and the election of Abraham Lincoln. This gave rise to the Republican party which formed around Lincoln. It was during Lincoln’s Presidency that the first ‘fiat’ money, called ‘greenbacks,’ went into circulation. Later, Lincoln opposed the system of central banks of which he helped set up and proposed a return to the gold standard but was killed before he was able to advance any of these ideas.
The Third Party System saw numerous changes in the monetary system. In 1873, the Fourth Coinage Act was enacted by Congress embracing the gold standard and demonetizing silver, thus ending the system of bi-metalism set up by the Constitution. In 1878, the Bland-Allison Act was enacted which reintroduced bi-metalism in the country. In 1890, the Sherman Silver Purchase Act was passed which repealed the 1873 Coinage Act. This controversy over bi-metalism lasted from the days of Lincoln until the Presidency of Grover Cleveland when the Fourth Party System formed.
The Third Party System points to the time period of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. The Fourth Party system formed during Grover Cleveland’s days pictured the time period of Jacob returning to Canaan after dwelling in Padan Aram. The Fourth Party system ‘officially’ began during the McKinley Presidency which pointed to the Biblical narrative transitioning to the life of Joseph.
The Fourth Party System, known as the Progressive Era, formed during the Presidency of Grover Cleveland. It is this era which saw the supporters of the gold standard overcome those who supported the bi-metalism instituted by the Constitution. Cleveland’s Presidencies point to the days of Jacob dwelling in the land of Canaan after coming out of Padan Aram. The defining aspects of Grover Cleveland’s second term as President were the Panic of 1893 where the stock market crashed and caused the worst economic depression in the country’s history until that time. This connects to the panic or fear that Jacob felt after Levi and Simeon slaughtered the people of Shechem (Genesis 34:30).
Cleveland believed that the Panic was caused due to the Sherman Silver Purchase Act of 1890 during Benjamin Harrison’s administration which saw the country’s currency backed by both silver and gold. Cleveland repealed the Sherman Silver Purchase Act which began the end of silver as a basis for American currency. This connects with the hiding of the idols under the oak by Shechem when Jacob went up to Bethel to meet with God (Genesis 35:1-4). The Hebrew word for ‘hid’ in Genesis 35:4 is טמן ‘taman’ which also means a treasure. Here we see the ‘treasures’ of Israel being put out of sight in connection with the ‘treasure’ of silver being ‘put out of sight’ in regards to coinage during Cleveland’s days.
Due to the Panic of 1893 and the suffering which the common man endured during the second term of Cleveland, he was not able to run again for President in 1896. Many blamed Cleveland for preventing the nation from recovering by placing the U.S. on a gold standard. William Jennings Bryan was the leader of this movement who said he would not allow mankind to be “crucified on a cross of gold”. This speech led Bryan to become the Democratic nominee in 1896. William McKinley would defeat Bryan for the Presidency however, establishing gold as the sole standard for U.S. Currency.
Bryan’s “Cross of Gold Speech” and his loss to McKinley brings forth an interesting parable as William McKinley’s Presidency represents Jacob’s desire for protection from the inhabitants of Canaan. After the slaughter of Shechem, Jacob told his children to cleanse their clothing and put away the strange gods from among them (Genesis 35:1). This was a portrayal of the end of silver currency. Following this, God puts His fear into the hearts of the inhabitants of the land, giving Jacob his desired protection. Jacob ‘put on’ the helmet of salvation, the ‘head’ of Israel who is Messiah (1Thessalonians 5:8; Genesis 48:16; 49:18; Ephesians 5:23; Colossians 1:18). It is during McKinley’s Presidency that the Biblical narrative turns to the life of Joseph, whose life is an incredible picture of the Messiah.
Silver plays an important part in the lives of both Joseph and Jesus as both were betrayed for silver. Joseph was sold into slavery for silver (Genesis 37:28) and later this would happen to Jesus as Judas betrayed Him for thirty pieces of silver (Matthew 26:15; Zechariah 11:12). Zechariah 11:13 says this was the ‘glorious price’ at which He was valued.
Historians speak of William McKinley‘s Presidency as the true beginning of the Fourth Party system, known as the Progressive Era. McKinley’s Presidency is a picture of the beginning of the life of Joseph who would become the main figure in the Biblical narrative until the days of Moses. This displays the Fourth Party system which was dominated by Republicans until the days of Franklin Delano Roosevelt whose Presidency speaks of the Pharaoh who ‘knew not Joseph.’ The Fifth Party system would then form around FDR.
Woodrow Wilson personified the ‘Progressive Era’ and brought forth a ‘New Freedom’ plan which saw the institution of the Federal Reserve and the beginning of a globalist mind set for America. It is because of the Federal Reserve system that Franklin Delano Roosevelt was able to set up the ‘New Deal.’
The formation of the Federal Reserve points to Joseph’s buying up of the land, property and people during his tenor in power which led to the unfortunate situation of the wicked Pharaoh spoken of in Exodus 1. This paved the way for Moses to be used by God to begin a new ‘era’ in the Bible.
Woodrow Wilson later lamented that he took part in the establishment of the Federal Reserve system.
“I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world. No longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.”
Here we see a plan which was supposed to help the people of the country but due to corruption opened up the doors for more centralized government. This connects with the days of Joseph as well. Joseph’s decree to take a fifth of the grain of Egypt (Genesis 41:34) was designed to preserve life but brought the peoples into slavery to Pharaoh (Genesis 47:13-26) who would later turn into a murderous tyrant (Exodus 1:8-22).
Wilson’s Presidency also saw the Revenue Act of 1913 which was a continuation of the income tax instituted during William Howard Taft‘s Presidency. Taft’s Presidency saw the income tax placed on only the wealthier people of the country whereas Wilson’s Presidency brought the income tax upon everyone but the poorest of the land.
The income tax is a further connection to Joseph’s taking of the fifth of the grain of Egypt and the enslavement of the people to Pharaoh.
The Fifth Party system formed around Franklin Roosevelt’s ‘New Deal.’ The nation would now be divided between Liberals who supported the New Deal and Conservatives who opposed it. This points to the days of Moses. The time of Moses brings about a new era in the Bible of God’s dealing with man where His written Word was given and would be the guide for man’s life (Deuteronomy 32:47).
It was during FDR’s Presidency that the Bretton Woods system was set up which internationalized the monetary system in the United States. The Bretton Woods system brought forth an international exchange rate based upon the U.S. dollar and saw the formation of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), today called the World Bank Group.
This move towards internationalism is linked to the days of Moses. Scripture speaks of the nations being divided according to the number of the children of Israel (Deuteronomy 32:8). This connection between the nations of the world and Israel is further seen in Exodus 15:23-27 where Israel dwelt at Elim amidst 12 palm trees and 70 wells of water. The palm trees point to the number of tribes of Israel and the wells correspond to the 70 nations mentioned in Genesis 10.
The Global Order
The Fifth Party System also saw the institution of the United Nations. The United Nations represents the gathering of all nations into one body. This points to Israel who is to rule all nations with a rod of iron. However, this will only truly come about during the days of the Messiah (Psalm 2:9; Revelation 2:26-27; 12:5). The United Nations then represents a false kingdom of ‘peace’ which in reality leads to slavery. This false kingdom is personified in the concept of the ‘new world order’ which was brought forth during the Presidency of Richard Nixon.
Nixon’s Presidency saw the end of the gold standard and the establishment of the fiat currency system which continues to this day. In 1971, President Richard Nixon unilaterally ordered the cancellation of the direct convertibility of the United States dollar to gold. This act was known as the Nixon Shock. Nixon’s Presidency pictured the days of Joshua and the conquering of the promised land unto the days of the Judges and the corruption of the people where they mixed the worship of the heathen with the worship of the true God.
It is said that there was a ‘political realignment’ during the days of Nixon as well where the idea of ‘New Federalism’ was brought forth which was to be a return to the days of Jefferson where the power of the Federal government would be transferred back to the States in accordance with the 10th Amendment to the Constitution. Some even describe this political realignment as the 6th party of American politics.
Yet another ‘political realignment’ occurred during the Presidency of Ronald Reagan which saw ‘Reaganomics’ and a new era of Conservatism. Reagan’s Presidency pictures the days of King David and his conquering of the surrounding nations.
Some believe another ‘political realignment’ occurred during Bill Clinton’s Presidency and his ‘New Democrats’ movement. His presidency pictures the days of the kings of Israel and the prophets. As far as the economy goes, there was nothing of significance other than the balancing of the budget and Federal surplus during his presidency which had not occurred in many years.
Nixon’s system of fiat currency has continued until the current day. However, talk of the constitutionality of the Federal Reserve has become more mainstream as a result of the Liberty movement formed around Ron Paul and the America First party of Trump. The new party system which is forming is due in part to this movement which is primarily based upon a return to the gold standard, the end of the Federal Reserve and American emperialism. This new party system would be picturing the days of the Apostles and the transition of God’s dealings with His people.
It is interesting to note that the days of Israel dwelling in the promised land is linked to American Imperalism and the ideology of globalism. The days of the Apostles saw an end of Israel dwelling in the land and a transition in focus to the Gospel being preached to the nations.
Will the new political era of America see an end of globalism or major transformation thereof? In 2016 and his first term as President, Donald Trump spoke of a change in America’s dealings with the United Nations and NATO. In his second term he has spoken of expanding America’s control over numerous areas of the world, perhaps setting the stage for world powers to control large regions.
This new era in American politics which corresponds with the Gospel dispensation should see numerous changes in our nation.
As mentioned before, there is a good probability of monetary change and major change in foreign policy and America’s role in the world. In future articles I hope to share how this new era will effect numerous issues such as abortion, gay marriage, the War on Terror, Israel & Palestine, and racism among other issues. This article is a generalized view.
At this point it would be prudent to discuss the “Establishment” and globalism as this subject is at the core of the new era being formed in the world. The following was written in 2016, as time permits I’ll try to update this to the current year 2026.
The major theme of 2016 election was about the choice between establishment and “anti-establishment” candidates. As the primary season has come to a close the presumptive Democratic nominee is Hillary Clinton and the presumptive nominee of the Republican party is Donald Trump. The choice between these two personify this establishment versus anti-establishment dichotomy. Going further, the choice between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton displays the choice between a continuation of the globalist agenda of America versus a new course of nationalism where “America is first.” Hillary Clinton is an establishment globalist while Donald Trump is an anti-establishment nationalist. Clinton represents a continuation of the “status quo” while Trump displays a new path.
This section of this article is going to focus on the subject of globalism and the “new world order.” The new world order is based upon the phrase ‘novus ordo seclorum’ which the Founders of America applied to the birth of the United States. The vision of the ‘new order’ of the Founders is displayed in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution which are based upon the natural law of God which in points back to the Word of God. It is a continuation of the vision of the Pilgrims of America being a “shining city upon a hill” in which America would be used as a bulwark to spread the Gospel to the world.
The ‘new order’ which is envisioned by the establishment today is based upon this same foundation but has been corrupted, just as the idea of a “shining city upon a hill” has been corrupted since the Presidency of George W. Bush. Instead of America being an example which other nations can emulate, the United States has used force to spread its ideology to other peoples. This parallels the mistaken view of the Pharisees and Sadducees in the first century of the Messiah coming and destroying their enemies through force and setting Israel up as the head of the nations.
However, Jesus Christ did not come with force to destroy the enemies of God. He gained the victory by giving His life for the sins of mankind. His was a message that the Kingdom of God begins within the heart of man (Luke 17:21) and would spread by peace, not violence (Mark 16:15; Luke 4:18; Romans 10:15; Ephesians 6:15). When asked when He was going to bring the Kingdom, Jesus told His apostles to turn their focus to spreading the Gospel to the world (Acts 1:6-8).
In the code, the days of Israel dwelling in the promised land is displayed by the time period in American history of FDR to Obama, the time of “American Imperialism.” The days of the Apostles saw an end of Israel dwelling in the land and a transition in focus to the Gospel being preached to the nations.
We are currently in the Fifth Party System or era which began during the days of Franklin Roosevelt and corresponds with the ‘dispensation’ of Moses, the Old Covenant and the giving of the Law. There have been a number of significant changes during this era, called ‘political re-alignments’ but the FDR style government has continued to this day.
The next ‘dispensation’ in the Scriptures was the time period of the Apostles and the New Covenant where the focus of God’s dealings with His people transitions from the Old Covenant, the Temple system and living in the Promised Land to the dispensation of the New Testament and the spreading of the Gospel to the four corners of the world.
Currently, we are seeing a transition in the political scene of America as well. This corresponds with the time period of John the Baptist, Jesus Christ and His Apostles as they became the third major ‘party’ or sect in Israel.
The corruption of the religious leaders in the first century was seen by many in the nation so they flocked to John the Baptist (Matthew 3:5; Mark 1:5; Luke 3:7) and later to Jesus Christ (Matthew 4:25; 5:1; 8:1; 12:15; 15:30; 21:9; Luke 5:15; 14:25).
This movement continued into the days of the Apostles recorded in the book of Acts where God’s dealings with His people began to change. The focus of believers would change from the Temple system and a desire to rule in the Promised land, to spreading the Gospel of salvation to all of mankind (Acts 1:6-8). This corresponds with the political change which is occurring in America.
The “establishment” as they are called today or the “status quo” called by Ron Paul are essentially equivalent with the Bushes and Clintons.
At the beginning of the 2016 election, it was thought that the general election would be a choice between Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton. However, due to the populist uprising that has occurred, this foregone conclusion has not come to fruition. This election has become a choice between following the current path of the “establishment” or rejecting their leadership for a new path as opposed to a choice between two versions of the establishment.
In other words, instead of a choice between a globalist Republican or a globalist Democrat, the America people are being given a choice between globalism or nationalism.
The Bushes and Clintons represent the “establishment” and their political ideology that has dominated American politics since the 1990s. In the Presidents code, this corresponds with the time period of Israel living in the land of Israel and their “ups and downs” in following God during the times of the first and second temple period.
George H.W. Bush‘s Presidency displayed the time of Solomon and the going astray of the nation of Israel which occurred during his reign. Bill Clinton displayed the time of the Kings and Prophets unto the building of the second temple. This was a time in which Israel went astray worshiping idols which led to their exiles into foreign lands. George W. Bush‘s Presidency exhibited the time of Israel’s return to the land during the time of Ezra and Nehemiah, the second Temple and the Maccabees unto the days of John the Baptist and the coming of Christ. Barack Obama‘s time in office continues this time period of Christ and the corrupt leadership of the Pharisees and Sadducees.
So, according to the “code,” we are currently living in the time period of the first century and the days in which Jesus Christ walked the earth. Regardless of who is elected President, this time period will continue to be displayed. The question is whether or not the individual elected will bring forth a focus on Jesus or that of the corrupt leadership of the Sadducees and Pharisees of that time. Will the individual elected continue the current path of the “establishment” or bring about the beginnings of a new era?
From my examination of what a Trump Presidency could produce, significant changes should occur in American politics which would fully establish a new era corresponding with the new era that came forth in the first century with Jesus and His Apostles. A Clinton Presidency would continue the “status quo” but may lead to a new era based upon the corruption which the Clinton’s have always been involved in.
The broad view of the establishment are those who are following the New Deal political system set up during the Presidency of FDR which has continued to today. This era is known as the 5th party system which has grown and changed in different eras but overall has continued. In the “code,” the 5th party system corresponds with the Biblical dispensation of the Mosaic covenant.
Globalism is a defining aspect of this era with the founding of the United Nations during the FDR administration. From the time of Franklin Roosevelt to today, American politics has been focused on globalism. This focus on globalism grew out of World War II and continued due to the Cold War.
In the Presidents Code, the Cold War displays the conflict between Israel and the Canaanite nations which began after Israel was delivered from Egypt. This conflict continued until the days of Solomon (1 Kings 4:21-25) which corresponds to the Presidency of George H.W. Bush when the Cold War also ended.
The beginning of the Cold War began during the Presidency of Harry Truman which portrayed the time of Moses. The promise of victory over Canaan began during the days of Moses (Exodus 23:31; Deuteronomy 11:24) just as the beginning of the Cold War began during Harry Truman’s days.
The victory of America in the Cold War was obtained by the propagation of human rights throughout the world, in particular in communist nations. Human rights is the belief that all men have rights given to them by their Creator, in the ‘code,’ this is a picture of the law of God. The law of God is likened unto light (Proverbs 6:23; Psalm 119:105). It is this light that Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan wished to shine forth to the world during their Presidencies. It is this light that David shined forth which gave him victory over the nations which surrounded him (Deuteronomy 4:1; 5:32-33; 6:1-3; 1 Chronicles 28:8; 22:12-13; Psalm 132:12; 1 Kings 2:3-4).
Human rights was the fundamental tenant of Jimmy Carter’s foreign policy. He likened this method of dealing with other nations to America being a ‘beacon on a hill’ (Matthew 5:14; Philippians 2:15; Isaiah 62:12). This aspect was continued by Ronald Reagan which ultimately led to the fall of the Soviet Union and victory in the Cold War by the U.S.
Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan displayed the life of King David who brought forth Israel’s victory over the neighboring countries of Canaan (2 Samuel 7:1). Reagan’s Presidency also pictures the transition from David to Solomon as the King of Israel as George H.W. Bush was elected to succeed Reagan as President, due in large part to Reagan’s popularity. Many of the Cold War victories were completed during Bush’s presidency, just as the Kingdom of Israel fully realized the fruit of David’s labors during the reign of Solomon.
The victories of which Reagan attained as President were more fully manifested in the early years of George H.W. Bush’s Presidency. This pictures the kingdom of peace in which Solomon inherited from his father (1 Kings 4:21). The fall of the Berlin Wall, the solidarity movement in Poland which led to a change towards Democracy, free elections in Nicaragua and the eventual collapse of the Soviet Union occurred during the Presidency of Reagan’s ‘heir’ George Bush but the credit is often given to Reagan.
Bush was the “father” of the modern day globalist ideology of the establishment. Most of his career in politics was geared towards globalism. George Bush was the director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in 1976 which is a picture of Solomon, the wise one (1 Kings 4:29-34). Between 1977 and 1979, He was the director of foreign policy for the Council on Foreign Relations. This points to Solomon who had all nations come to him to hear his wisdom (1 Kings 4:34; 10:24).
Bush was considered a foreign relations expert which was displayed in his actions at the ending of the Cold War, the Madrid Conference and the war with Saddam Hussein. These were pictures of the conquering of the Promised land, the building of the Temple and the fall of Solomon. It was Solomon’s fall which displays Bush’s name meaning of shame which came upon Israel as a result of mixed worship and rebellion against the Most High. This mixture plagued Israel throughout the days of the kings leading into their exiles into Assyria and Babylon (2 Kings 3:3; 10:29, 31; 13:2, 6, 11; 15:9; 17:22-23).
Bush proclaimed a New World Order based upon the law of the United Nations.
“It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations Charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance.” {Address to the General Assembly of the U.N. 2/1/1992}
In the Presidents Code, the United Nations represents the gathering of all nations into one body. This points to Israel who is to rule all nations with a rod of iron. The 70 nations of the world are divided up according to the number of the children of Israel (Deuteronomy 32:8). However, this will only truly come about during the days of the Messiah (Psalm 2:9; Revelation 2:26-27; 12:5).
George H.W. Bush is the first President to openly dedicate the United States to the goal of forming a ‘new world order.’ He spoke openly of this desire for a new world order in a number of his speeches. As mentioned previously, the new world order is a corrupted form of the Kingdom of Heaven in which Jesus, the King of Israel reigns (John 1:49).
America has always displayed a picture of a ‘heavenly kingdom.’ Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan likened the United States as a beacon on a hill of which Jesus Christ applied to His people (Matthew 5:14). John Winthrop was the first to speak of America as this city on a hill in 1630 in a speech he gave to the Massachusetts Bay colonists. He advised them that the whole world would be looking upon their actions as they had proclaimed their desire to leave the Old World for the New World seeking religious freedom to serve the Lord according to the dictates of their hearts.
With George H.W. Bush, this picture of a ‘light on a hill’ transfers to a new world order, a ‘false light.’ Order is associated in Hebrew with the ‘Word’ and ‘Light.’ The Hebrew words for ‘light’ and ‘word’ are similar in that they have the same meaning of order. Light comes from the word אר ‘or’ which literally means order as light is necessary for order. The Hebrew word for ‘word’ is דבר ‘davar’ and also has the sense of order as words are an orderly arrangement of letters.
The English word ‘order’ comes from the Latin word ‘ordo.’ Tracing this word back in the Latin Vulgate translation of the Bible brings forth an interesting picture of a land without order being a land of darkness. This is yet another connection between order and light.
Job 10:21 Before I go whence I shall not return, even to the land of darkness and the shadow of death;
Job 10:22 A land of darkness, as darkness itself; and of the shadow of death, without any order (Latin ‘ordo’), and where the light is as darkness.
This is what the ‘new world order’ is. It is a false light/order which in reality is pure darkness (Matthew 6:23). The New World Order is based upon all nations following the law of the United Nations whereas the ‘City on a Hill’ is based upon following the natural law of God where man is given unalienable rights of Life, Liberty and Property which derive from the Law of God. The Law of God is defined as His Word (Numbers 15:29-31; Deuteronomy 5:2-5; Isaiah 1:10; 2:2-3; 5:24) and His Light (Proverbs 6:23; Psalm 119:105).
In the parables of the Presidencies of Truman to Reagan, the Cold War represented Israel’s battles to conquer the Promised land. In George H.W. Bush‘s Presidency a friendship between America and Russia was formed which depicted the time in which Israel mixed with the nations around them and joined in their religious beliefs as seen in the account of the foreign wives of Solomon. In Bill Clinton’s Presidency this is further depicted in the friendship between Bill Clinton and Boris Yeltsin. During the time period of the Kings of Israel a continuance of the mixture between Israel and the foreign nations around them is seen. Israel had mixed the worship of the true God with the rituals of the Mystery religions (1 Kings 16:30; 18:4, 18; 2 Kings 17:15-16, 27-28, 33-41; 23:4-5; 2 Chronicles 33:7; Jeremiah 2:9-13; 7:8-11; 9:13-14; 11:17; 12:16; 16:1-21; 19:5; 23:13, 27; Hosea 2:13-17; Zephaniah 1:4-5; Nehemiah 9:26).
Israel’s backsliding into the worship rituals of the heathen led to the dividing of their nation and ended the power with which they had during the days of David and Solomon.
In 1993, The Battle of Mogadishu occurred which depicts this weakening of the nation. Commonly known as ‘Black Hawk Down,’ American forces were sent into Somalia to help still a civil war in the country. During the operation, two U.S. helicopters were shot down which led to numerous American casualties and images on television of American troops being dragged through the streets. It was one of the most embarrassing and humiliating events in U.S. military history. Whereas Israel had military dominion over the surrounding nations during the days of David and Solomon, this diminished during the period of two houses and saw both houses eventually overcome and taken into exile.
This weakening of America which has continued to today is concurrent with the rise of terrorist attacks in America and the advent of the War on Terror.
Terrorist attacks and the War on Terror parallel the time period of Israel and the Temple system, in particular the second Temple. The second Temple period was a time in which Israel was dominated by foreign powers while setting up the system of Judaism based upon the Word of God and a mixture of traditions and customs passed down orally. This time period saw the a transition in power structure within Israel from Kings and Prophets to scribes and Pharisees/Sadducees. This was a time which began in religious zeal for God which led to a time of righteousness but ended in religious zeal against God leading to a time of wickedness.
In the “code,” the second term of Bill Clinton depicted the return of Israel to the Promised land after their exile in Babylon. It was at this time that the second Temple was built. The leaders of Israel rightly understood that their exile was caused as a result of their rebellion against the Law of God. As a result, they purposed to return to walking in His laws (Ezra 9:7-14; Nehemiah 9:26-38; 13:18; Zechariah 1:4-6). Later, the leaders of the nation set up ‘fences’ around the law to protect the people from going into exile again. These fences were the foundation of the ‘oral law’ or the ‘traditions of the elders’ which are spoken of in the New Testament (Matthew 15:2; Mark 7:8; 1 Peter 1:18; Galatians 1:14) which led to the message and movement of John the Baptist and Jesus Christ.
In the New Testament, this oral law is called the “tradition of the elders” which led Israel into rebellion against God (Matthew 15:2-9; Mark 7:3-13). They became corrupt and crooked in the words of the Apostle Peter (Acts 2:40).
Act 2:40 And with many other words did he testify and exhort, saying, Save yourselves from this untoward generation.
The word ‘untoward’ in Greek in this verse is σκολιός ‘skolios’ which literally means crooked. This corrupt political system of Israel in the 1st century is being played out today in the crooked political system of America. This crooked system of the establishment is personified by Hillary Clinton.
Richard Nixon “began” the current new world order political focus of America and it was “ramped up” during Bush 41. This globalism parallels Israel’s struggle to rule over the promised land during the Old Covenant era. Clinton, Bush 43 and Obama have continued Bush’s worldview of a “new world order”. This is the essence of the “establishment.”
Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan departed a bit from this focus on globalism, instead focusing on “human rights” as a way to overcome communism. This points to David and the promise from God of him being King, but more importantly King Messiah coming from his lineage and a greater land promise.
With the coming of Messiah a new era began for God’s people. Because of Israel’s leadership rejecting Christ, Jesus said He would give the kingdom to a new people. Near the end of His ministry, the Jews asked Jesus where He got His authority to do what He was doing in which He asked them about their belief in the baptism of John (Matthew 21:23-27; Mark 11:27-33; Luke 20:2-8). They “craftily” answered they they did not know if God sent him or not in order to prevent an insurrection amongst the people. Jesus then gave them the parable of the vineyard where the workers of the vineyard killed the servants of their Master and eventually His Son so that they could seize the inheritance (Matthew 21:28-41; Mark 12:1-9; Luke 20:9-16). Jesus said because of their rejection of Him they would be rejected and the vineyard/kingdom would be given to others (believers in Christ/Christians – Ephesians 3:8-12) (Matthew 21:42-44; Mark 12:10-11; Luke 20:17-19).
The large crowds and the almost ‘messianic fervor’ which was seen for Barack Obama in 2008, and Ron Paul in 2012 are indicative of the state of the people in this country. This fervor has transitioned today to Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders. The people are desperate for change. They are tired of the corruption seen in their government. This was seen during the days of Messiah as well. The corruption of the religious leaders was seen by many in the nation so they flocked to John the Baptist (Matthew 3:5; Mark 1:5; Luke 3:7) and later to Jesus Christ (Matthew 4:25; 5:1; 8:1; 12:15; 15:30; 21:9; Luke 5:15; 14:25)..
This movement continued into the days of the Apostles recorded in the book of Acts where God’s dealings with His people began to change. The focus of believers would change from the Temple system and a desire to rule in the Promised land, to spreading the Gospel of salvation to all of mankind (Acts 1:6-8). This corresponds with the political change which is occurring in America.
This ‘dispensation’ which has been named the ‘Church Age’ by theologians would be paralleled in our days in a future Sixth Party System. It is too early to give a solid prediction but another ‘Party System’ is due to occur in the near future. Time will tell whether this means a new party will form or whether there will be significant changes within the current two-party system.
As mentioned before, the Sadducees were the ‘conservative’ party during the Second Temple period and the Pharisees were the ‘liberal’ party. The Sadducees disappeared from the scene after the fall of the Temple, leaving only the Pharisees and a new ‘sect’ called Christians.
The Pharisees formed Judaism while Christianity came forth from the believers of Christ. This was the biggest change in the “politics” of Israel in their history so we may be in for a truly profound change in American politics.
How will this new Biblical new equate with in American politics? There should be a significant change in the two party system, in particular with the Republicans. There may be a change in America’s role from “policeman” of the world and variant focus on the U.N. Will the US leave the UN or leave its position as “leader”? Will the focus of America turn from globalism to nationalism?
There is also a good probability of monetary change and perhaps significant changes in major issues such as abortion, gay marriage, the War on Terror, Israel & Palestine, and racism.
As mentioned before, globalism has been a defining aspect of the era of FDR which continues to today. Following will be a review of this era in American politics and how it fits into the “Presidents Code.”
Franklin Roosevelt approved the current design on the one dollar bill with the Great Seal on the reverse side.
Franklin Roosevelt’s Presidency redefined the role of government in the lives of Americans which began the Fifth Party System that is still in effect today. The Fifth Party system separated the nation into two parties, Liberals who believe that Roosevelt’s New Deal system of government interceding on behalf of the people is the way to go versus Conservatives who believe that government should play a smaller role in the lives of the people. This Party System corresponds to the era of Moses being sent as the ‘giver of the law.’
The time of Moses brought about a new era in the Bible of God’s dealing with man where His written Word was given and would be the guide for man’s life (Deuteronomy 32:47).
It was during FDR’s Presidency that the Bretton Woods system was set up which internationalized the monetary system in the United States. The Bretton Woods system brought forth an international exchange rate based upon the U.S. dollar and saw the formation of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), today called the World Bank Group.
This move towards internationalism is linked to the days of Moses. Scripture speaks of the nations being divided according to the number of the children of Israel (Deuteronomy 32:8). This connection between the nations of the world and Israel is further seen in Exodus 15:23-27 where Israel dwelt at Elim amidst 12 palm trees and 70 wells of water. The palm trees point to the number of tribes of Israel and the wells correspond to the 70 nations mentioned in Genesis 10.
The Fifth Party System also saw the institution of the United Nations. The United Nations represents the gathering of all nations into one body. This points to Israel who is to rule all nations with a rod of iron. The 70 nations of the world are divided up according to the number of the children of Israel (Deuteronomy 32:8). However, this will only truly come about during the days of the Messiah (Psalm 2:9; Revelation 2:26-27; 12:5). The nation of Israel did not bring forth the kingdom of God and salvation to earth (Isaiah 26:18) but ended up under the dominion of the heathen (Daniel 7:2-14). The United Nations parallels the failure of the nation of Israel and can only present a false kingdom of ‘peace’ which in reality leads to slavery.
The days of Moses and the prophets lasted until the days of John the Baptist (Luke 16:16) when God’s dealings with men began to change through His Son (Hebrews 1:1) when the New Covenant was cut in Him (Jeremiah 31:31-34; Hebrews 8:1-13; 10:1-24). He would no longer deal with man through the letter of the law, but now through the Spirit of the law (2 Corinthians 3:6; Romans 8:2-4; Galatians 3:5; 5:18; Philippians 3:7-10).
This next ‘dispensation’ in the Scriptures was the time period of the Apostles and the New Covenant where the focus of God’s dealings with His people transitions from the Old Covenant, the Temple system and living in the Promised Land to the dispensation of the New Testament and the spreading of the Gospel to the four corners of the world.
The United Nations was founded upon Franklin Roosevelt’s “Four Freedoms” with these freedoms being incorporated into the preamble to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Israel’s deliverance from Egypt and Pharaoh personified freedom and the giving of the law was meant to keep them free (Psalm 119:44-45). However, the law which was meant to keep man free only leads to slavery due to the sin within man’s carnal heart (Romans 7:5; 8:7).
It is only through the process of being born again through faith in Christ and the giving of the Holy Spirit that man can truly experience freedom (2 Corinthians 3:17; Romans 7:5-6). It is not the Old Covenant that brings this freedom, it is the new (2 Corinthians 3:1-18; Galatians 4:5-7). Franklin Roosevelt’s Presidency corresponds with the time of Moses and the giving of the law. The Fifth Party System in American politics also began during this time period and continues to today. In the Presidents Code, this Party System, or era, corresponds with the Biblical dispensation of the Old Covenant which ended with the establishment of the New Covenant cut at Calvary.
While the professed goals of the United Nations are honorable, the implementation and globalist ideology which has come forth has not always been so. So too, the law of Moses which is “holy and just and good” and meant to bring life only leads to death in the unregenerate man (Romans 7:5-13).
The law of Moses was used as the foundation of Judaism which grew into the corrupt religious system of the Pharisees and Sadducees which opposed Christ Jesus in the 1st century. Today this is being paralleled in American politics with the corrupt globalist political ideology of the establishment which has grown out of the political ideology instituted during the Presidency of FDR.
This globalist ideology, which is today known as the “new world order,” is based upon the phrase “Novus Ordo Seclorum” which the Founders of America applied to the political system they were establishing in the United States. The vision of this “Novus Ordo” of the Founders is seen in the Declaration of Independence and Constitution which is based upon the natural law of God. This “Novus Order” is personified in the idea of America being a “shining city” upon a hill, an example for the rest of the world of what freedom in God can bring a people.
The “Novus Ordo” which is sought for today is based upon this same foundation but it has been corrupted, just as the idea of a “shining city” has been corrupted since the days of George H.W. Bush. Instead of America being an example which other nations can emulate, the United States has used force to spread its ideology to other peoples.
The forced spread of Democracy to other nations of the world is justified under the doctrine of ‘American Exceptionalism.’ This idea is based upon America’s goodness seen in its form of government which is based upon rights given by a Creator. The problem with the current usage by the establishment is that the concept of a shining city upon a hill has always been one of setting an example for others to follow, not forcing American ideals upon them by warfare.
Both the Pharisees and Sadducees believed that the Messiah would come to save Israel by force, destroying their enemies through war and setting up Israel as the head of the nations. This is depicted by the Neocon idea that the American empire will spread by the use of its military power and thus lead the peoples of the world into freedom. Contrariwise, Jesus Christ came preaching the Gospel of love and repentance towards God. His was a message that the Kingdom of God begins within the heart of man (Luke 17:21) and would spread by peace, not violence (Mark 16:15; Luke 4:18; Romans 10:15; Ephesians 6:15).
The establishment’s corrupted view of American Exceptionalism is further paralleled in the belief of Jews during the Second Temple period that they were somehow better, or more exceptional, than other peoples because they were the seed of Abraham (John 8:33). This belief was rebuked by John the Baptist.
Matthew 3:9 And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.
The message of Jesus was that the actions of believers, walking in the love of the Word of God is what makes them the shining city upon a hill.
John 8:39 They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham’s children, ye would do the works of Abraham.
Matthew 5:14 Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on an hill cannot be hid.
Matthew 5:15 Neither do men light a candle, and put it under a bushel, but on a candlestick; and it giveth light unto all that are in the house.
Matthew 5:16 Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven.
Scripture declares this light as the Word of God (Proverbs 6:23; Psalm 119:105), who became flesh and dwelt among us (Isaiah 9:2; John 1:9; 8:12; 9:5; 12:46). During the second Temple period, Israel had come to boast that they were this light, forgetting that it is not they, but the Word of God that shines as light into the world (Romans 2:17-29).
Franklin Roosevelt spoke of these two contradicting views of “new orders.” FDR spoke of America, during his days, continuing the “novus ordo” of the Founders.
“We have undertaken a new order of things; yet we progress to it under the framework and in the spirit and intent of the America Constitution. We have proceeded throughout the Nation a measurable distance on the road toward this new order.” {Annual Message to the Congress January 4, 1935}
The globalist “new order” of the today’s establishment corresponds more with the corrupt “new order” FDR applied to our enemies.
“Those who seek to establish systems of Government based upon the regimentation of all Human Beings by a handful of individual rulers…call this a new order. It is not new and it is not order.” {Address Delivered by President Roosevelt at Washington, March 15, 1941}
“Hitler has often protested that his plans for conquest do not extend across the Atlantic Ocean. But his submarines and raiders prove otherwise. So does the entire design of his new world order.
For example, I have in my possession a secret map made in Germany by Hitler’s government-by the planners of the new world order. It is a map of South America and a part of Central America, as Hitler proposes to reorganize it. Today in this area there are fourteen separate countries. The geographical experts of Berlin, however, have ruthlessly obliterated all existing boundary lines; and have divided South America into five vassal states, bringing the whole continent under their domination. And they have also so arranged it that the territory of one of these new puppet states includes the Republic of Panama and our great life line-the Panama Canal.
That is his plan. It will never go into effect.
Your government has in its possession another document made in Germany by Hitler’s government. It is a detailed plan, which, for obvious reasons, the Nazis did not wish and do not wish to publicize just yet, but which they are ready to impose-a little later-on a dominated world-if Hitler wins. It is a plan to abolish all existing religions-Protestant, Catholic, Mohammedan, Hindu, Buddhist and Jewish alike. The property of all churches will be seized by the Reich and its puppets. The cross and all other symbols of religion are to be forbidden. The clergy are to be forever silenced under penalty of the concentration camps, where even now so many fearless men are being tortured because they have placed God above Hitler…”
“A God of Blood and Iron will take the place of the God of Love and Mercy. Let us well ponder that statement which I have made tonight.” {Franklin D. Roosevelt’s “Navy Day Address” on the attack on the Destroyer Kearney October 27th, 1941}
FDR spoke of the “new world order” which America was seeking as a peaceful cooperation between countries.
“Since the beginning of our American history we have been engaged in change – in a perpetual peaceful revolution – a revolution which goes on steadily, quietly adjusting itself to changing conditions, without the concentration camp or the quicklime in the ditch.
“The ‘World Order’ which we seek is the co-operation of free countries, working together in a friendly, civilized society.” {Franklin Roosevelt speech to a Joint Session of Congress January 6, 1941}
America’s current view of the “new order” is a mixture between the two “orders” of which Roosevelt spoke. The “establishment” has depicted the peaceful cooperative “order” with its mouth but its actions have aligned more with the “order” of Hitler.
In the code, Hitler depicts Pharaoh which the Bible describes as a type of Satan the dragon (Ezekiel 29:3; 32:2). During the 1st century, Jesus spoke of the leadership of Israel as children of the devil (John 8:44). In the ‘code,’ the political establishment of today correspond with this corrupt leadership of Israel in the 1st century.
Going further, the Bible connects the leadership of Israel with the beast. Jesus spoke of the leadership of Israel being responsible for the blood of the prophets and saints (Luke 11:49-51) in the same terminology as the beast of Revelation (Revelation 18:24).
The leadership of Israel in the 1st century came forth from the time of Ezra who re-established Israel upon the foundation of God’s Word. However, this leadership became increasingly corrupt until the time of Jesus and His apostles spreading the Gospel in which they were spoken of as an ‘untoward generation’ (Acts 2:40). The word ‘untoward’ in Greek in this verse is σκολιός ‘skolios’ which literally means crooked.
Part of the message of the Gospel was an admonition to the people to be saved from this wicked generation (Acts 2:40). This began with John the Baptist (Matthew 3:7-10) and continued with Jesus (Matthew 12:34; 16:4; 17:17; 23:33; Mark 8:38) unto the spreading forth of the Gospel by the Apostles (Acts 2:40; 7:51; 13:46).
The United Nations was “born” in 1945 during the Presidency of Franklin Roosevelt but the charter which made the United Nations “official” was signed during the Presidency of Harry Truman just months after FDR’s death.
Harry Truman’s Presidency is defined by the dropping of the Atom bomb and the victory of the Allied Forces in World War II. His Presidency is a picture of the days of Moses being sent by God to deliver Israel from bondage to Pharaoh. The plagues which were sent upon Egypt, Passover, the crossing of the Red Sea and Israel’s rebellion in the wilderness are all displayed in parable form in Truman’s term in office.
World War II was won during Truman’s Presidency. The Allied forces had virtually defeated the Axis Powers in Europe during FDR‘s administration but victory was not proclaimed until Truman’s days in office. However, in the Pacific, the Japanese were still fighting hard against the Allies. It was during this time that the Manhattan Project was transpiring in which the Atom Bomb was being formed.
Truman spoke of the Atom bomb as the ‘prophesied fire of destruction’ of the Lord (2 Peter 3:5-10).
“We have discovered the most terrible bomb in the history of the world. It may be the fire destruction prophesied in the Euphrates Valley Era, after Noah and his fabulous Ark.”
The atom bombs dropped upon Japan at Hiroshima and Nagasaki correspond to the last plague that the Lord sent upon Pharaoh (Exodus 11:1-10). This last plague was sent in culmination of the hard heart of Pharaoh who refused to let Israel go (Exodus 4:21; 7:13; 11:10; Romans 9:15-22).
The hard heart of Pharaoh connects with the unrepentant heart of man that leads to the day His wrath where fire burns up his enemies (Romans 2:4-11; 2 Peter 3:7). This hard heart was displayed by the leaders of Japan who refused to surrender.
The first test detonation of the atom bomb was given the code name, ‘Trinity.’ The name was said to be given by laboratory leader J. Robert Oppenheimer who referred to the bomb in reference to a poem by John Donne. “As West and East / In all flatt Maps—and I am one—are one, / So death doth touch the Resurrection.”
This poem links to Passover which brought death to Egypt but ‘resurrection’ to Israel (Exodus 13:15) where whosoever believed in the Lord were gathered together as one (Exodus 12:37-38). This is a foreshadowing of the death of Christ, the Passover Lamb of God (Isaiah 53:7; John 1:29; 1 Peter 1:19; Revelation 5:6, 12) who gathers all people together into one (John 10:16; Galatians 3:26-29; Ephesians 2:10-22; 4:4-6).
It was also the atom bomb that gave the Allies the victory and led to the forming of the United Nations where all nations are to become ‘one.’
The Hebrew word for atom bomb is פרד ‘parad’ which literally means to separate, as in a seed separating from the parent plant. This word is used in reference to the dividing of the nations during the days of the Tower of Babel (Genesis 10:5, 32) which were divided according to the number of the children of Israel (Deuteronomy 32:8). This connection between the nations of the world and Israel is further seen in Exodus 15:23-27 where Israel dwelt at Elim amidst 12 palm trees and 70 wells of water. The palm trees point to the number of tribes of Israel and the wells correspond to the 70 nations mentioned in Genesis 10.
Before Israel came to Elim, they had to cross the Red Sea which they did on dry ground (Exodus 14:16, 22).
Truman further displayed his belief that Communism could only be overcome by faith in God. It was only by faith in God that Israel was able to overcome their enemies and cross the Red Sea (Deuteronomy 1:30; 9:3; 20:4; 31:3-6; Hebrews 11:28-29).
“It is only the people of religious faith throughout the world who have the power to overcome the force of tyranny. It is in their beliefs that the path can be found to justice and freedom. Their religious concepts are the only sure foundation of the democratic ideal.”
The Korean War, which was the first conflict of the Cold War, occurred during the Truman administration in 1950. North Korea invaded South Korea in which Truman called for the United Nations to intervene, thus involving the United States. The word Korea means ‘high serenity’ or ‘land of morning calm.’ The first conflict that Israel had with the Canaanite nations was with Amalek at Rephidim (Exodus 17:8). Rephidim has the same meaning as Korea, literally ‘resting place.’
Dwight Eisenhower was set up by Franklin Roosevelt to lead the Allied forces to victory in Europe and later made commander of NATO by President Truman. As President, Eisenhower continued this globalist ideology.
In his first Inaugural address, Eisenhower spoke of America being guided by certain fixed principles, one of which was working within the framework of the United Nations and spoke of it as being a “living sign” of hope for peace.
“Respecting the United Nations as the living sign of all people’s hope for peace, we shall strive to make it not merely an eloquent symbol but an effective force. And in our quest for an honorable peace, we shall neither compromise, nor tire, nor ever cease.”
In his second Inaugural address, Eisenhower continued these sentiments.
“We recognize and accept our own deep involvement in the destiny of men everywhere. We are accordingly pledged to honor, and to strive to fortify, the authority of the United Nations. For in that body rests the best hope of our age for the assertion of that law by which all nations may live in dignity.”
John F. Kennedy continued the belief that the United Nations was our hope for peace.
“To that world assembly of sovereign states, the United Nations, our last best hope in an age where the instruments of war have far outpaced the instruments of peace, we renew our pledge of support—to prevent it from becoming merely a forum for invective—to strengthen its shield of the new and the weak—and to enlarge the area in which its writ may run.” {John F. Kennedy Inaugural Address}
Lyndon Johnson proclaimed continued support of the United Nations after the death of JFK.
“From this chamber of representative government, let all the world know and none misunderstand that I rededicate this Government to the unswerving support of the United Nations, to the honorable and determined execution of our commitments to our allies, to the maintenance of military strength second to none, to the defense of the strength and the stability of the dollar, to the expansion of our foreign trade, to the reinforcement of our programs of mutual assistance and cooperation in Asia and Africa, and to our Alliance for Progress in this hemisphere.” {Lyndon Johnson “Let Us Continue” 11/27/1963}
Richard Nixon envisioned a ‘new world order’ with himself as the ‘peacemaker.’ Nixon’s proclamation of a “new world order” is interesting in light of the code as his Presidency depicts the time in which Israel conquered the land of Canaan. As mentioned before, the globalism which America has been involved in during the last century parallels this time period in the Biblical narrative.
The phrase ‘new world order’ comes from the Latin phrase ‘Novus Ordo Seclorum’ which was adapted by Charles Thomson in 1782 while designing the Great Seal of the United States. This phrase comes from Virgil’s Ecologue IV in which he speaks of a ‘new order of the ages’ and the return of the reign of Saturn. Saturn was said to have reigned during a golden age where gods ruled over man. This is in reality speaking of the days of Noah (Genesis 6:1-4). The interesting thing about Saturn is that he was said to be the god of commerce and minting of coins.
The end of the gold standard in 1971 created a nearly worldwide fiat money system in which bankers or money changers would have unlimited power to manipulate the economy. ‘Fiat’ comes from the Latin word ‘fiat’ which means ‘it shall be.’ This comes from the Hebrew word היה ‘hayah’ which means ‘to be.’ For the United States, it literally means the chairman of the Federal Reserve can say ‘let it be’ and it happens. The contrast between God and Mammon is displayed in this system (Luke 16:13-15; Matthew 6:19-24). היה ‘hayah’ means ‘to be’ as in ‘I AM’ which is speaking of God Himself (Exodus 3:14). Here we see in this period of American history a parable of the two tables of which Paul spoke of (1 Corinthians 10:21).
1 Corinthians 10:21 Ye cannot drink the cup of the Lord, and the cup of devils: ye cannot be partakers of the Lord’s table, and of the table of devils.
To further elaborate, let us look at Jesus Christ’s assault on the moneychangers. In John 2:14-17 we see the Messiah making a whip out of ropes and overturning the tables of the moneychangers who had turned His Father’s house into a den of thieves. The language that the Lord used, ‘den of thieves,’ refers back to the words of Jeremiah.
Jeremiah 7:11 Is this house, which is called by my name, become a den of robbers in your eyes? Behold, even I have seen it, saith the LORD.
What was Israel doing at this time? Mixing the worship of Baal with the worship of the LORD (Jeremiah 7:9-10). This mixture traced back to the days of the judges of which Nixon’s Presidency points to (Judges 2:13).
The English word money comes from the Latin word ‘moneta’ which means to mint or coinage. This word comes from the Roman goddess Juno, in whose temple, money was coined. This links back to the days of the Judges in which Israel mixed the worship of Baal and Ashtaroth (Judges 2:13), of whom Juno is another name for.
‘Moneta’ traces back further to the Hebrew word מנה ‘maneh.’ This too, connects to the concept of the two tables mentioned previously in 1 Corinthians 10. This word is used in reference to the table that Israel prepared for ‘that number’ during the days of Isaiah. The phrase ‘that number’ in Hebrew is מנה ‘maneh.’ This was a custom Israel inherited from the days of the Judges.
Isaiah 65:11 But ye are they that forsake the LORD, that forget my holy mountain, that prepare a table for that troop, and that furnish the drink offering unto that number.
Going further into these connections is the root word of מנה ‘maneh’ which is מן ‘man.’ This is the Hebrew word for manna. Manna fell as ‘hoar frost’ upon the ground (Exodus 16:14). The Hebrew word for ‘hoar frost’ is כפור ‘kaphor,’ which is also translated as money as mentioned earlier. The Apostle Paul links these concepts together in his warning not to partake of the table of God and the table of demons. Paul says that the bread of which we eat at the table of the Lord (1 Corinthians 10:16-17), which was foreshadowed in the manna in the wilderness (John 6:32-33, 50-51, 58), is not to be mixed with the ‘bread’ of the heathen (1 Corinthians 10:20).
As mentioned previously, at this point in history Israel had corrupted its ways and began mix amongst the heathens in the land (Judges 2:13). Baal worship consisted of human sacrifice and huge fires which Scriptures speaks of as ‘passing one’s seed through the fires of Molech’ (Leviticus 18:21; 20:2-5; Jeremiah 19:5; 32:35). Another name for Molech is Saturn, mentioned previously. These sacrifices to Molech correspond with the 1973 Supreme Court case Roe v. Wade which legalized abortions in this nation on a Federal level.
Globalist ideology continued in America through the Presidencies of Ford, Carter and Reagan although in varying degrees. Reagan in specific was critical of the U.N. as he saw it undermining the sovereignty of the United States. Reagan’s criticized the U.N. and globalism but overall was not opposed. If his views weakened America’s globalist outlook, his successor more than compensated.
George Bush was the United States Ambassador to the United Nations in the Nixon administration from 1971-1973. From 1976-1977 he was the Director of the CIA and then went on to become the director of the Council on Foreign Relations foreign policy organization. Needless to say, Bush was no opponent to globalism.
Bush Before a Joint Session of Congress September 11, 1990 Famous New World Order Speech
George Bush’s vision of the “new world order” is based upon the “rule of law” which hearkens back to the law of Moses, the time period of which the 5th party system displays.
George Bush’s Presidency was greatly defined by the Gulf War. In August of 1990, Saddam Hussein led an Iraqi invasion of Kuwait which led to an open rebuke by President Bush and a demand of complete withdrawal from the nation. Bush was acting upon the Carter Doctrine which proclaimed that the United States would use military force to protects its interests in the Middle East. Hussein did not back down and in November, Bush went to the United Nations in support for war against Iraq. This began a precedent in which the United States would go to the United Nations in support of military action leading to the idea of a ‘one world order.’
After the end of the Cold War, the globalist prospect of a one world order was brought forth by Mikhael Gorbachev and George Bush in which the United Nations would be the supreme authority of the nations. George Bush spoke of this conflict with Iraq as an opportunity to bring about a new world order.
“We stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment. The crisis in the Persian Gulf, as grave as it is, also offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective — a new world order — can emerge: a new era — freer from the threat of terror, stronger in the pursuit of justice, and more secure in the quest for peace. An era in which the nations of the world, East and West, North and South, can prosper and live in harmony. A hundred generations have searched for this elusive path to peace, while a thousand wars raged across the span of human endeavor. Today that new world is struggling to be born, a world quite different from the one we’ve known. A world where the rule of law supplants the rule of the jungle. A world in which nations recognize the shared responsibility for freedom and justice. A world where the strong respect the rights of the weak. This is the vision that I shared with President Gorbachev in Helsinki. He and other leaders from Europe, the Gulf, and around the world understand that how we manage this crisis today could shape the future for generations to come.” {Address Before a Joint Session of the Congress – 9/11/1990}
It was at this time that the U.S. and the Soviet Union worked together in a common cause for the first time since World War II, officially ending the Cold War. This points to a transition from the days of David and Solomon as a righteous king, to the next period in the Biblical narrative of wicked kings.
“Once again, Americans have stepped forward to share a tearful goodbye with their families before leaving for a strange and distant shore. At this very moment, they serve together with Arabs, Europeans, Asians, and Africans in defense of principle and the dream of a new world order. That’s why they sweat and toil in the sand and the heat and the sun. If they can come together under such adversity, if old adversaries like the Soviet Union and the United States can work in common cause, then surely we who are so fortunate to be in this great Chamber — Democrats, Republicans, liberals, conservatives — can come together to fulfill our responsibilities here. Thank you. Good night. And God bless the United States of America.” {Address Before a Joint Session of the Congress – 9/11/1990}
Bush proclaimed a New World Order based upon the law of the United Nations.
“It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations Charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance.” {Address to the General Assembly of the U.N. 2/1/1992}
In the Presidents Code, the United Nations represents the gathering of all nations into one body. This points to Israel who is to rule all nations with a rod of iron. The 70 nations of the world are divided up according to the number of the children of Israel (Deuteronomy 32:8). However, this will only truly come about during the days of the Messiah (Psalm 2:9; Revelation 2:26-27; 12:5). The nation of Israel did not bring forth the kingdom of God and salvation to earth (Isaiah 26:18) but ended up under the dominion of the heathen (Daniel 7:2-14). The United Nations parallels the failure of the nation of Israel and can only present a false kingdom of ‘peace’ which in reality leads to slavery.
Solomon’s fall led to the era of apostate Israel, a time of conspiracy against the Lord (Jeremiah 11:9; Ezekiel 22:25; Isaiah 28:15, 18). So too, George H.W. Bush’s Presidency saw a time in which the United States would be used to begin a period in history where nations would seek to form a ‘new world order.’ The new world order is the origin of many conspiracy theories of which many people believe that the antichrist, of whom Solomon pictures, will arise.
While it is not the purpose of this ‘code’ to delve deeply into these conspiracy theories, this issue must be addressed as it is bound up with the Bush – Solomon connection. George Bush’s proclamations of the New World Order are at the heart of conspiracy theories today. So too, Solomon and his kingdom is at the heart of the various secret society doctrines that have passed down through the centuries.
To begin with, George H.W. Bush is a member of the Order of Skull and Bones which is a secret society of Yale. Secret societies have always been a subject of controversy in the United States as depicted in the words of John F. Kennedy:
“The very word ‘secrecy’ is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings.” {John F. Kennedy – The President and the Press given before the American Newspaper Publishers Association 4/27/1961}
Bush’s last name traces back to the Hebrew word בוש ‘bush’ which personifies this word ‘repugnant.’ The first use of this word goes all the way back to the sin of Adam and Eve in partaking of the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil where they realized they were naked and became ashamed (Genesis 2:25; 3:7). This is the origin of all the Mystery Religions of which the secret societies of the past and today derive. The imagery of the sewing of fig leaves to make aprons to cover their nakedness is displayed in the Mysteries to represent secrecy and the secret doctrine of men becoming gods.
The logo of the Skull and Bones of Yale is the skull and cross bones symbol which traces back to the Knights Templar of whom numerous secret societies and conspiracy theories are associated with. The Templars took this imagery from the Mystery Religions and the head of Adonis. At the bottom of the skull and bones is the number 322. This number traces back to Genesis 3:22 which speaks of man being a ‘god,’ knowing good and evil.
This ‘knowledge of good and evil’ is further seen in William Howard Taft who was the first President of the United States that was a member of the Skull and Bones society, his father was one of the founders of the secret society. Taft’s Presidency points to Joseph, the wise one (Genesis 41:39) who was also a ‘diviner’ (Genesis 44:15). This word divine comes from the Hebrew word נחש ‘nachash’ which literally means the serpent, as in the serpent who offers knowledge through the tree of knowledge. Taft was also a Unitarian who proclaimed that he did not believe in the divinity of Christ. This is at the core of the Mysteries as Christ has to be put on a lower level so that man can be exalted. In the code, this Unitarian belief is connected to the beguiling of the serpent in Genesis 3 and Thomas Jefferson.
Another member of the society was James Jesus Angleton who was called the ‘mother of the Central Intelligence Agency’ (CIA). George H.W. Bush would later become director of the CIA which pictures Solomon, the wisest man in all the earth (1 Kings 4:29-34). However, Solomon allowed foreign wives to lead him astray into the ways of the Mystery Religions, the origin of secret societies (1 Kings 11:1-10). So too, the CIA has been used by various Presidents to infiltrate foreign nations to lead them into doing the will of the U.S. This has tarnished the reputation of the United States in the eyes of many nations and led to the current foreign policy of the establishment which is a corruption of the ‘novus ordo’ of the Founding Fathers.
George H.W. Bush is the first President to openly dedicate the United States to the goal of forming a ‘new world order.’ He spoke openly of this desire for a new world order in his speeches. As mentioned previously, the new world order is a corrupted form of the Kingdom of Heaven in which Jesus, the King of Israel reigns (John 1:49).
America has always displayed a picture of a ‘heavenly kingdom.’ Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan likened the United States as a beacon on a hill of which Jesus Christ applied to His people (Matthew 5:14). John Winthrop was the first to speak of America as this city on a hill in 1630 in a speech he gave to the Massachusetts Bay colonists. He advised them that the whole world would be looking upon their actions as they had proclaimed their desire to leave the Old World for the New World seeking religious freedom to serve the Lord according to the dictates of their hearts.
With George H.W. Bush, this picture of a ‘light on a hill’ transfers to a new world order, a ‘false light.’ Order is associated in Hebrew with the ‘Word’ and ‘Light.’ The Hebrew words for ‘light’ and ‘word’ are similar in that they have the same meaning of order. Light comes from the word אר ‘or’ which literally means order as light is necessary for order. The Hebrew word for ‘word’ is דבר ‘davar’ and also has the sense of order as words are an orderly arrangement of letters.
The English word ‘order’ comes from the Latin word ‘ordo.’ Tracing this word back in the Latin Vulgate translation of the Bible brings forth an interesting picture of a land without order being a land of darkness. This is yet another connection between order and light.
Job 10:21 Before I go whence I shall not return, even to the land of darkness and the shadow of death;
Job 10:22 A land of darkness, as darkness itself; and of the shadow of death, without any order (Latin ‘ordo’), and where the light is as darkness.
This is what the ‘new world order’ is. It is a false light/order which in reality is pure darkness (Matthew 6:23). The New World Order is based upon all nations following the law of the United Nations whereas the ‘City on a Hill’ is based upon following the natural law of God where man is given unalienable rights of Life, Liberty and Property which derive from the Law of God. The Law of God is defined as His Word (Numbers 15:29-31; Deuteronomy 5:2-5; Isaiah 1:10; 2:2-3; 5:24) and His Light (Proverbs 6:23; Psalm 119:105).
The Pilgrims who left Europe because of religious persecution saw America as a New Israel in which they could worship God according to the dictates of their hearts based upon God’s promise to David.
2 Samuel 7:10 Moreover I will appoint a place for my people Israel, and will plant them, that they may dwell in a place of their own, and move no more; neither shall the children of wickedness afflict them any more, as beforetime,
They saw themselves as God’s vine in the wilderness (Isaiah 5:1-7; Matthew 21:33-43) picturing themselves in the same light as their Hebrew forefathers fleeing from Egypt. They saw the King of England as Pharaoh, the Atlantic Ocean as the Red Sea and America as the new Promised Land. Ezra Stiles, who was President of Yale, proclaimed the American people as ‘God’s American Israel.’ It is interesting to note that the Skull and Bones society comes from this same college.
Meanwhile, those who adhered to the ideology of the Mystery schools also came to this land to escape religious persecution. They envisioned America as a New Atlantis which was personified in Francis Bacon’s writings. Bacon spoke of the island of ‘Bensalem’ which means son of Peace where a new House of Solomon would be built which would be a confraternity of philosophers dedicated to the acquisition of knowledge where man could evolve into godhood.
Here we see the two versions of the Kingdom of Israel. The Kingdom during David and Solomon’s early years in which Israel walked in the light of the Word of God versus the Kingdom of Israel during the days of wicked Israelite kings in which Israel walked in a mixture of the Word of God and the doctrines of the Mystery religions.
This concept is further depicted in James Madison‘s words when he stated that the government of the United States is based upon man’s ability to self govern himself according to the Ten Commandments of God.
“We have staked the whole future of American civilization, not upon the power of government, far from it. We’ve staked the future of all our political institutions upon our capacity…to sustain ourselves according to the Ten Commandments of God.” {James Madison to the General Assembly of the State of Virginia 1778}
Contrariwise, George Bush declared that America was founded upon the Noachide laws which come not from the Word of God, but a mixture of the Word of God and the Mysteries inherited by Israel when they dwelt in exile in Babylon. Public Law 102-14 was passed during Bush’s Presidency which declares that “the United States of America was founded upon the Seven Universal Laws of Noah, and that these Laws have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization.”
The new world order is defined as a world of peace where all nations live under the law of the United Nations. In the code, the United Nations is a picture of Israel’s destiny to rule over the nations but its failure due to their rejection of their Messiah.
The formation of the United Nations goes back to World War II and the dropping of the atom bomb during Harry Truman‘s Presidency. In the code, the dropping of the atom bomb was a picture of the last plague upon Egypt where the firstborn was slain while those who partook of the Passover were spared. Those who believed in the Lord were gathered together as one (Exodus 12:37-38).
This is a foreshadowing of the death of Christ, the Passover Lamb of God (Isaiah 53:7; John 1:29; 1 Peter 1:19; Revelation 5:6, 12) who gathers all people together into one (John 10:16; Galatians 3:26-29; Ephesians 2:10-22; 4:4-6).
The Hebrew word for atom bomb is פרד ‘parad’ which literally means to separate, as in a seed separating from the parent plant. This word is used in reference to the dividing of the nations during the days of the Tower of Babel (Genesis 10:5, 32) which were divided according to the number of the children of Israel (Deuteronomy 32:8). This connection between the nations of the world and Israel is further seen in Exodus 15:23-27 where Israel dwelt at Elim amidst 12 palm trees and 70 wells of water. The palm trees point to the number of tribes of Israel and the wells corresponding to the 70 nations mentioned in Genesis 10.
Here we see the gathering together of Israel into one nation corresponding with the formation of the United Nations. George Bush’s proclamation of a New World Order lines up with the time period of Israel dwelling together as one nation in peace during the days of Solomon (1 Kings 4:20-34). This is a picture of the Kingdom of Heaven in which all mankind is in unity under the rulership of Jesus Christ (Revelation 20:4). However, Solomon’s days also display a corruption in Israel which leads to the dividing of the nation; פרד ‘parad.’ This corresponds with Operations Desert Storm and Desert Shield in which bombs were used to ‘unify.’
Richard Nixon also spoke of a ‘new world order,’ although not in the same frequency or openness as George Bush. In the code, Nixon‘s Presidency is a picture of Israel dwelling in unity under the leadership of Joshua, yet in their rebellion they went astray and lived under a period of Judges unto the days of King Saul.
Here we see in the concept of a New World Order, a corrupted version of Israel ruling over the Promised Land. While the concept of the United Nations is lofty with mankind dwelling in unity, in reality it displays that mankind will never dwell in peace and harmony until the return of Jesus Christ. So too, the New World Order concept proposed by globalists will not bring forth an era of peace and harmony as it pictures the days of wicked rulership in Israel.
George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama have all supported this ‘new world order’ ideology, although various terms have been used in relation to it. These Presidents picture the days of wicked rulership in Israel. From the wicked kings of Israel to the days of the Pharisees and Sadducees of whom John the Baptist and Jesus Christ came to rebuke.
Bush Sr.’s New World Order was depicted as a way to bring ‘peace and security’ to the world.
“What is at stake is more than one small country, it is a big idea — a new world order, where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind: peace and security, freedom, and the rule of law. Such is a world worthy of our struggle, and worthy of our children’s future.” {State of the Union Address 1/29/1991}
This phrase, ‘peace and security,’ was used by the false prophets who promised Israel the same thing during the days of the wicked kings (Deuteronomy 29:19; Jeremiah 6:14; 8:11; Ezekiel 13:10). God sent true prophets such as Isaiah and Jeremiah and Ezekiel to Israel to warn them to repent but the false prophets comforted the people with words of ‘peace and security.’
The Fifth Party system formed around Franklin Roosevelt‘s ‘New Deal.’ The nation would now be divided between Liberals who supported the New Deal and Conservatives who opposed it. This points to the days of Moses. The time of Moses brings about a new era in the Bible of God’s dealing with man where His written Word was given and would be the guide for man’s life (Deuteronomy 32:47).
It was during FDR’s Presidency that the Bretton Woods system was set up which internationalized the monetary system in the United States. The Bretton Woods system brought forth an international exchange rate based upon the U.S. dollar and saw the formation of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), today called the World Bank Group.
This move towards internationalism is linked to the days of Moses. Scripture speaks of the nations being divided according to the number of the children of Israel (Deuteronomy 32:8). This connection between the nations of the world and Israel is further seen in Exodus 15:23-27 where Israel dwelt at Elim amidst 12 palm trees and 70 wells of water. The palm trees point to the number of tribes of Israel and the wells correspond to the 70 nations mentioned in Genesis 10.
The Fifth Party System also saw the institution of the United Nations. The United Nations represents the gathering of all nations into one body. This points to Israel who is to rule all nations with a rod of iron. However, this will only truly come about during the days of the Messiah (Psalm 2:9; Revelation 2:26-27; 12:5). The nation of Israel did not bring forth the kingdom of God and salvation to earth (Isaiah 26:18) but ended up under the dominion of the heathen (Daniel 7:2-14). The United Nations parallels the failure of the nation of Israel and can only present a false kingdom of ‘peace’ which in reality leads to slavery. This false kingdom is personified in the concept of the ‘new world order’ which was brought forth during the Presidency of Richard Nixon.
Nixon’s Presidency saw the end of the gold standard and the establishment of the fiat currency system which continues to this day. In 1971, President Richard Nixon unilaterally ordered the cancellation of the direct convertibility of the United States dollar to gold. This act was known as the Nixon Shock. Nixon’s Presidency pictured the days of Joshua and the conquering of the promised land unto the days of the Judges and the corruption of the people where they mixed the worship of the heathen with the worship of the true God.
This system of fiat currency has continued until the current day. However, talk of the constitutionality of the Federal Reserve has become more mainstream as a result of the aforementioned movement which has formed around Ron Paul. A new party system may be forming as result of the movement which is primarily based upon a return to the gold standard, the end of the Federal Reserve and American imperialism. This new party system would be picturing the days of the Apostles and the transition of God’s dealings with His people.
The days of Israel dwelling in the promised land is linked to American Imperialism. The days of the Apostles saw an end of Israel dwelling in the land and a transition in focus to the Gospel being preached to the nations.
Bill Clinton agreed with Bush about the New World Order
Bill Clinton continued George Bush’s path of globalization and expanded upon it. Clinton saw the new order as having already begun.
“To renew America, we must meet challenges abroad as well at home. There is no longer division between what is foreign and what is domestic—the world economy, the world environment, the world AIDS crisis, the world arms race—they affect us all.
Today, as an old order passes, the new world is more free but less stable. Communism’s collapse has called forth old animosities and new dangers. Clearly America must continue to lead the world we did so much to make.
While America rebuilds at home, we will not shrink from the challenges, nor fail to seize the opportunities, of this new world. Together with our friends and allies, we will work to shape change, lest it engulf us.” {Bill Clinton Inaugural address}
George W. Bush continued the path that his father set. In his second inaugural he hearkened back to the “new order” the Founders spoke of.
“When our Founders declared a new order of the ages, when soldiers died in wave upon wave for a union based on liberty, when citizens marched in peaceful outrage under the banner “Freedom Now” — they were acting on an ancient hope that is meant to be fulfilled.
“History has an ebb and flow of justice, but history also has a visible direction set by liberty and the author of liberty. When the Declaration of Independence was first read in public and the Liberty Bell was sounded in celebration, a witness said, “It rang as if it meant something.” In our time it means something still. America, in this young century, proclaims liberty throughout all the world and to all the inhabitants thereof. Renewed in our strength — tested, but not weary — we are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom.”
Recall that FDR spoke of two different “new orders.” One applied to the vision of the Founders of America of a nation founded upon freedom in the natural law of God, in other words the Word of God. The other order is based upon freedom from God, the “freedom” which the serpent offered Adam and Eve in the Garden.
The United States has always had two opposing forces working against each other. One side wishes to see this nation used as a beacon of light and liberty which comes from God. The other side wishes to see this nation used a harbinger of the false light of the adversary.
This dichotomy is found in the number 1776, the year in which America declared its independence from Britain the the number found at the bottom of the pyramid on the Great Seal.
1776 is the value of the Hebrew letters in Genesis 1:4:
Gen 1:4 And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.
To one side, 1776 represents liberty/freedom in Christ who answered the“appeal to heaven” of America’s Founding Fathers. To the other side, 1776 represents the birth of a new order which will culminate in a “New Atlantis”. The side we choose as a nation will determine the course of our future. We can be a shining city on a hill proclaiming the Gospel of Liberty or we can bring forth ‘hell on earth.’
John Winthrop spoke of the concept of liberty/freedom in God versus liberty from God in 1645. Winthrop is famous for his vision of America being a “city upon a hill” shining the light of the Gospel to the world.
“There is a twofold liberty, natural (I mean as our nature is now corrupt) and civil or federal. The first is common to man with beasts and other creatures. By this, man as he stands in relation to man simply, hath liberty to do what he lists: it is a liberty to evil as well as to good. This liberty is incompatible and inconsistent with authority, and cannot endure the least restraint of the most just authority. The exercise and maintaining of this liberty makes men grow more evil, and in time to be worse than brute beasts: omnes sumus licentia deteriores. This is that great enemy of truth and peace, that wild beast, which all the ordinances of God are bent against, to restrain or subdue it.
The other kind of liberty I call civil or federal; it may also be termed moral, in reference to the covenant between God and man, in the moral law, and the politic covenants and constitutions, amongst men themselves. This liberty is the proper end and object of authority, and cannot subsist without it; and it is a liberty to that only which is good, just, and honest. This liberty you are to stand for, with the hazard (not only of your goods, but) of your lives, if need be. Whatsoever crosseth this is not authority, but a distemper thereof. This liberty is maintained and exercised in a way of subjection to authority; it is of the same kind of liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free…” {John Winthrop – Little Speech on Liberty 1645}
John Winthrop’s vision of America being a “city upon a hill” is the basis for the Neoconservative movement which came to power during the George W. Bush administration. The Neocon version however is corrupt.
One of the foundations of the Neo-Conservative movement is based upon using American power to ‘spread’ Democracy to other nations in the guise of protecting America and its interests abroad. To achieve this they even support pre-emptive war which had never been apart of the rule of conduct for America.
This doctrine can be seen in George W. Bush’s second Inaugural Address.
“There is only one force of history that can break the reign of hatred and resentment, and expose the pretensions of tyrants, and reward the hopes of the decent and tolerant, and that is the force of human freedom.
We are led, by events and common sense, to one conclusion: The survival of liberty in our land increasingly depends on the success of liberty in other lands. The best hope for peace in our world is the expansion of freedom in all the world.
America’s vital interests and our deepest beliefs are now one. From the day of our Founding, we have proclaimed that every man and woman on this earth has rights, and dignity, and matchless value, because they bear the image of the Maker of Heaven and earth. Across the generations we have proclaimed the imperative of self-government, because no one is fit to be a master, and no one deserves to be a slave. Advancing these ideals is the mission that created our Nation. It is the honorable achievement of our fathers. Now it is the urgent requirement of our nation’s security, and the calling of our time.
So it is the policy of the United States to seek and support the growth of democratic movements and institutions in every nation and culture, with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world.”
“We will persistently clarify the choice before every ruler and every nation: The moral choice between oppression, which is always wrong, and freedom, which is eternally right. America will not pretend that jailed dissidents prefer their chains, or that women welcome humiliation and servitude, or that any human being aspires to live at the mercy of bullies.
We will encourage reform in other governments by making clear that success in our relations will require the decent treatment of their own people. America’s belief in human dignity will guide our policies, yet rights must be more than the grudging concessions of dictators; they are secured by free dissent and the participation of the governed. In the long run, there is no justice without freedom, and there can be no human rights without human liberty.”
“Today, America speaks anew to the peoples of the world:
All who live in tyranny and hopelessness can know: the United States will not ignore your oppression, or excuse your oppressors. When you stand for your liberty, we will stand with you.
Democratic reformers facing repression, prison, or exile can know: America sees you for who you are: the future leaders of your free country.
The rulers of outlaw regimes can know that we still believe as Abraham Lincoln did: ‘Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves; and, under the rule of a just God, cannot long retain it.’
The leaders of governments with long habits of control need to know: To serve your people you must learn to trust them. Start on this journey of progress and justice, and America will walk at your side.”
As mentioned previously, Democracy and the concept of human liberty cannot be spread by force. In Bush’s second Inaugural speech we see the essence of the ‘Bush Doctrine,’ a veiled proclamation that America has declared ‘war’ on any country that is deemed tyrannical. This is a dangerous formula for unending wars in the name of promoting freedom. This corresponds to the corrupt proselytizing done by the scribes and Pharisees during the time of the second Temple.
Matthew 23:15 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.
The leaders of Judaism did not desire to convert other nations to Judaism for the sake of lofty religious ideals. They wanted to ‘convert’ them for the sake of base gain (Isaiah 56:10-12; 1 Peter 5:2). They spoke of proselytes as a ‘scab to Israel.’ John Lightfoot in his commentary of the New Testament from the Talmud and Hebraica said the following:
“Yet in making of these they used their utmost endeavours for the sake of their own gain, that they might some way or other drain their purses, after they had drawn them in under the show of religion, or make some use or benefit to themselves by them. The same covetousness, therefore, under a veil of hypocrisy, in devouring widows’ houses, which our Saviour had condemned in the former clause he here also condemns in hunting after proselytes; which the scribes and Pharisees were at all kind of pains to bring over to them. Not that they cared for proselytes; whom they accounted as ‘a scab and plague;’ but that the more they could draw over to their religion, the greater draught they should have for gain, and the more purses to fish in. These, therefore, being so proselyted, ‘they made doubly more the children of hell than themselves.’ For when they had drawn them into their net, having got their prey, they were no further concerned what became of them, so they got some benefit by them. They might perish in ignorance, superstition, atheism, and all kind of wickedness: this was no matter of concern to the scribes and Pharisees; only let them remain in Judaism, that they might lord it over their consciences and purses.”
So too, America’s leading of other nations to ‘convert’ to Democracy has produced the same imagery. The countries which America has ‘led’ to Democratic elections still view America unfavorably as an hypocritical foreign power that is only there to draw forth their riches and oil (Matthew 6:2, 5; 15:7; 23:13-15, 23-29; Luke 11:44).
This forced spread of Democracy to other nations of the world is justified under the doctrine of ‘American Exceptionalism.’ This idea is based upon America’s goodness seen in its form of government which is based upon rights given by a Creator. Its the concept of a ‘shining city upon a hill.’ The problem with the usage by the Neo-Conservative movement is that the concept of a shining city upon a hill has always been one of setting an example for others to follow, not forcing American ideals upon them by warfare.
Both the Pharisees and Sadducees believed that the Messiah would come to save Israel by force, destroying their enemies through war and setting up Israel as the head of the nations. This is depicted by the Neocon idea that the American empire will spread by the use of its military power and thus lead the peoples of the world into freedom. Contrariwise, Jesus Christ came preaching the Gospel of love and repentance towards God. The message that the Kingdom of God begins within the heart of man (Luke 17:21) and would spread by peace, not violence (Mark 16:15; Luke 4:18; Romans 10:15; Ephesians 6:15).
The neoconservative’s corrupted view of American Exceptionalism is further seen in the belief of Jews during the Second Temple period that they were somehow better, or more exceptional, than other peoples because they were the seed of Abraham (John 8:33). This belief was rebuked by John the Baptist.
Matthew 3:9 And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.
The message of Jesus was that the actions of believers, walking in the love of the Word of God is what makes them the shining city upon a hill.
John 8:39 They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham’s children, ye would do the works of Abraham.
Matthew 5:14 Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on an hill cannot be hid.
Matthew 5:15 Neither do men light a candle, and put it under a bushel, but on a candlestick; and it giveth light unto all that are in the house.
Matthew 5:16 Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven.
Scripture declares this light as the Word of God (Proverbs 6:23; Psalm 119:105), who became flesh and dwelt among us (Isaiah 9:2; John 1:9; 8:12; 9:5; 12:46). During the second Temple period, Israel had come to boast that they were this light, forgetting that it is not they, but the Word of God that shines as light into the world (Romans 2:17-29). This corrupted view is seen in George W. Bush’s 2002 speech on the anniversary of September 11th where he declared the cause of America as the hope of all mankind, borrowing a phrase from John Chapter 1 which is referring to the Word of God.
“Tomorrow is September the 12th. A milestone is passed, and a mission goes on. Be confident. Our country is strong. And our cause is even larger than our country. Ours is the cause of human dignity; freedom guided by conscience and guarded by peace. This ideal of America is the hope of all mankind. That hope drew millions to this harbor. That hope still lights our way. And the light shines in the darkness. And the darkness will not overcome it.”
‘And the light shines in the darkness. And the darkness will not overcome it.’ The Scripture says this is referring to Jesus Christ.
John 1:4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
John 1:5 And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.
This portion of Scripture in the book of John declares that Jesus is the Word made flesh, who was in the beginning with God (John 1:1-3). This Word in the beginning corresponds with the Declaration of Independence as true independence comes from the Word of God who is Messiah (John 8:31-32).
The problem with the Bush Doctrine is that many of the means which were instituted to spread Democracy to other nations were based in unconstitutional actions. The right message was being put forth, but the means by which it was to be instituted was corrupted. This was the problem with Israel during the days of King Herod.
The religious leaders of Israel during the days of King Herod were zealous for the law, but this zealousness was not mixed with the true intent of the law which is faith, hope and love (1 Corinthians 13:13). As a result, God sent John the Baptist to prepare the way for the Messiah (Matthew 3:1,3; 11:10; Luke 3:4; 7:27). The message of John the Baptist and the Messiah was one of restoration (Malachi 3:3-4; 4:5-6; Matthew 17:11-12; Mark 9:11-13), restoration to the true meaning and intent of the Word of God (Luke 1:68-79; 3:3-18).
The religious leaders of Israel had inherited a zealousness for the law from the Maccabees and saw their religion as that which defined them (1 Maccabees 2:19; 2 Maccabees 8:1; 14:38). The message of John the Baptist and Jesus Christ was not that of religion, but of relationship with God through covenant (Acts 5:20; Luke 3:8; 13:25-29; Matthew 7:21-23; 18:3; 21:31; Luke 6:46).
The religion which was set up by the leaders of Israel became known as the tradition of the elders (Matthew 15:3), a set of guidelines which the nation was to follow. In and of itself this is not a negative thing but the problem is that the people exalted their traditions above the Word of God. As a result, this religiosity became in reality, lawlessness (John 7:19; Matthew 23:28; Galatians 6:13).
The Clinton/Bush establishment is seeking an “order” which displays a counterfeit light pointing back to the “novus ordo” of the Founders but in reality is a corrupted version. This parallels the establishment of the Pharisees and Sadducees in the first century which based their religion of Judaism upon the Word of God but in reality were in rebellion against God (Matthew 15:1-9).
Barack Obama‘s time in office continues the time period of Christ and the corrupt leadership of the Pharisees and Sadducees. Obama opposed the foreign policy of the Neocons but has essentially continued the same path as he is also a globalist.
In his Inaugural address Barack Obama, who also opposed the wars of President Bush, displays this ‘shining city on a hill’ concept as being in contradiction to the Neo-conservative definition.
“As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals. Our Founding Fathers, faced with perils that we can scarcely imagine, drafted a charter to assure the rule of law and the rights of man — a charter expanded by the blood of generations. Those ideals still light the world, and we will not give them up for expedience sake.”
In 2014, President Obama spoke of the ‘novus ordo’ in similar terms as FDR, comparing the two different versions in a similar manner as Roosevelt.
President Obama Keynote EU Speech in Brussels at Palais Des Beaux Arts
“Leaders and dignitaries of the European Union; representatives of our NATO Alliance; distinguished guests: We meet here at a moment of testing for Europe and the United States, and for the international order that we have worked for generations to build.
Throughout human history, societies have grappled with fundamental questions of how to organize themselves, the proper relationship between the individual and the state, the best means to resolve inevitable conflicts between states. And it was here in Europe, through centuries of struggle — through war and Enlightenment, repression and revolution — that a particular set of ideals began to emerge: The belief that through conscience and free will, each of us has the right to live as we choose. The belief that power is derived from the consent of the governed, and that laws and institutions should be established to protect that understanding. And those ideas eventually inspired a band of colonialists across an ocean, and they wrote them into the founding documents that still guide America today, including the simple truth that all men — and women — are created equal…”
“But from the ruins of the Second World War, our nations set out to remake the world — to build a new international order and the institutions to uphold it. A United Nations to prevent another world war and advance a more just and lasting peace. International financial institutions like the World Bank and International Monetary Fund to promote prosperity for all peoples. A Universal Declaration of Human Rights to advance the “inalienable rights of all members of the human family.” {President Obama Keynote EU Speech in Brussels 3/26/2014}
Barack Obama’s role in the code is interesting as much of his message lines up with the message which Jesus delivered to Israel in the first century, but much of his political actions lined up with the establishment which corresponds with the corrupt leadership of Jesus’ day. His speech at Brussels displays this same imagery. Obama spoke of the international order of today as a continuation of the ‘novus ordo’ of the time of Franklin Roosevelt. This corresponds with the establishment of Israel basing their religion upon Moses as FDR displays the time of Moses in the code.
In the code, Donald Trump’s “anti-establishment” run for the Presidency lines up with the “anti-establishment” movement of John the Baptist and Jesus Christ in the first century. In the code, the globalist order of the establishment corresponds with the corrupt leadership of Israel in the first century and their religion of Judaism which mixed the Word of God with their traditions which blinded them to their Messiah and led them into rebellion against God (Matthew 15:14; 23:17-24).
The leadership of Israel in the 1st century came forth from the time of Ezra who re-established Israel upon the foundation of God’s Word. However, this leadership became increasingly corrupt until the time of Jesus and His apostles spreading the Gospel in which they were spoken of as an ‘untoward generation’ (Acts 2:40). The word ‘untoward’ in Greek in this verse is σκολιός ‘skolios’ which literally means crooked.
Part of the message of the Gospel was an admonition to the people to be saved from this wicked generation (Acts 2:40). This began with John the Baptist (Matthew 3:7-10) and continued with Jesus (Matthew 12:34; 16:4; 17:17; 23:33; Mark 8:38) unto the spreading forth of the Gospel by the Apostles (Acts 2:40; 7:51; 13:46).
Donald Trump’s anti-establishment stance and “America First” views line up with the message of Jesus and the Apostles who stood against the corruption of the establishment of their day.
Donald is from the Gaelic name ‘Domnhall’ which means “ruler of the world.” Domnall is a combination of the Celtic words ‘dumno’ which means world and ‘val’ which means rule. Through His work on the cross and resurrection, Jesus Christ sits at the right hand of the Father as the ruler of the world (Ephesians 1:20-21; Colossians 1:16; 2:10; Matthew 26:63-64; Mark 14:62; Luke 22:69; Daniel 7:13).
John comes from the Hebrew name יוֹחָנָן ‘Yochanan’ meaning the grace or camp of Yah. The grace of God was revealed through Jesus Christ (John 1:17; 2 Timothy 2:1; 1 Corinthians 1:4; Titus 2:11). The ‘camp of Yah’ is referring to believers in God and the land in which they live (Revelation 20:9; Hebrews 12:22-23; Psalm 89:7; Acts 20:28).
Trump is from the Middle English word ‘trumpe’ meaning a trumpeter or one who plays the trumpet. The trumpet is associated resurrection (1 Corinthians 15:52; 1 Thessalonians 4:16) which lines up with the “code” as we are currently in the time period of the narrative of the crucifixion. The voice of Christ is likened unto a trump as well (Revelation 1:10) which raises the dead (John 5:25). The voice of the Good Shepherd calls the lost sheep home (John 10:3, 16, 27-28; Jeremiah 31:10), rescuing them from the false shepherds (Isaiah 56:8-12; (Ezekiel 22:25-28; 34:2-10; Jeremiah 23:1-4; 50:6; Matthew 9:36; Mark 6:34; 1 Peter 2:25).
The trumpet is also used during times of war (Jeremiah 4:5, 19). The crucifixion was a culmination of the war which began in the beginning between the Seed of the woman (Genesis 3:15; Galatians 3:16) and the seed of the serpent. This war was won by the offering of Christ at Calvary (Isaiah 40:2).
Donald Trump is an anti-establishment candidate who, it seems, would do much in moving the country into a new era or party system. His name meaning points to the risen Christ who was victorious over His enemies, crushing the head of the serpent. It seems a Trump Presidency would be a move forward from the current time period of the crucified Christ who was temporarily “defeated” (heel bruised). Trump’s run for President has already effected change and pushed politics towards a 6th party system.
Trump is a nationalist who has openly opposed the globalist agenda of the establishment. The path to his rise to the position of Republican nominee was paved by another nationalist Ron Paul. In the code, Ron Paul portrays John the Baptist. In 2008 and 2012, Ron Paul was the only Presidential candidate who stood against the globalist ideology of the establishment and the interventionist policies of George W. Bush and Barack Obama.
This interventionism and forced spread of Democracy to other nations of the world is justified under the doctrine of ‘American Exceptionalism.’ This idea is based upon America’s goodness seen in its form of government which is based upon rights given by a Creator. The concept of a ‘shining city upon a hill.’ The problem with the usage by the Neo-Conservative movement is that the concept of a shining city upon a hill has always been one of setting an example for others to follow, not forcing American ideals upon them by warfare.
Both the Pharisees and Sadducees believed that the Messiah would come to save Israel by force, destroying their enemies through war and setting up Israel as the head of the nations. This is depicted by the Neocon idea that the American empire will spread by the use of its military power and thus lead the peoples of the world into freedom. Contrariwise, Jesus Christ came preaching the Gospel of love and repentance towards God. The message that the Kingdom of God begins within the heart of man (Luke 17:21) and would spread by peace, not violence (Mark 16:15; Luke 4:18; Romans 10:15; Ephesians 6:15).
The neoconservative’s corrupted view of American Exceptionalism is further seen in the belief of Jews during the Second Temple period that they were somehow better, or more exceptional, than other peoples because they were the seed of Abraham (John 8:33). This belief was rebuked by John the Baptist.
Matthew 3:9 And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.
The message of Jesus was that the actions of believers, walking in the love of the Word of God is what makes them the shining city upon a hill.
John 8:39 They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham’s children, ye would do the works of Abraham.
Matthew 5:14 Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on an hill cannot be hid.
Matthew 5:15 Neither do men light a candle, and put it under a bushel, but on a candlestick; and it giveth light unto all that are in the house.
Matthew 5:16 Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven.
Ron Paul staunchly opposed the wars of President Bush which were declared without approval of Congress in violation of the Constitution. He has suggested a foreign policy based upon the Golden Rule. This foreign policy lines up with the true ideals of a ‘shining city upon a hill’ which is showing forth the love of God by one’s actions which leads to others joining in the same (Matthew 5:14-16; John 5:35; Philippians 2:15).
When asked what Ron Paul’s view of foreign policy would be, he answer the golden rule.
“You know, many great religions, and especially both the Old and New Testament, talks about a golden rule. And I think it’s an important rule. We want to treat – we should treat other people the way we want to be treated. And I would like to suggest that possibly we should be thinking about having a foreign policy of the golden rule and not treat other countries any way other than the way we want to be treated.” {Ron Paul at the Voters Values Summit 10/8/11}
Donald Trump’s foreign policy departs from the current globalist path of American and lines up in many ways with the non-interventionist views of Ron Paul. In his foreign policy speech, Trump spoke of ending the nation-building focus and instead focusing on America first.
“We will no longer surrender this country, or its people, to the false song of globalism.”
Trump hearkened back to the time of Reagan when America won the Cold War.
“We are getting out of the nation-building business, and instead focusing on creating stability in the world.
Our moments of greatest strength came when politics ended at the water’s edge.
We need a new, rational American foreign policy, informed by the best minds and supported by both parties, as well as by our close allies.
This is how we won the Cold War, and it’s how we will win our new and future struggles.”
This allusion back to the time of Reagan is significant as it was Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan who displayed the good side of the ‘novus ordo’ of the Founders.
Human rights was the fundamental tenant of Jimmy Carter‘s foreign policy. He likened this method of dealing with other nations to America being a ‘beacon on a hill’ (Matthew 5:14; Philippians 2:15; Isaiah 62:12). This aspect was continued by Ronald Reagan which ultimately led to the fall of the Soviet Union and victory in the Cold War by the U.S.
Human rights is based upon the belief that all men have rights given to them by their Creator, is a picture of the law of God. The law of God is likened unto light (Proverbs 6:23; Psalm 119:105). It is this light that Carter and Reagan wished to shine forth to the world during their Presidencies. It is this light that David shined forth which gave him victory over the nations which surrounded him (Deuteronomy 4:1; 5:32-33; 6:1-3; 1 Chronicles 28:8; 22:12-13; Psalm 132:12; 1 Kings 2:3-4).
Ronald Reagan believed that America is a special place in which the Creator set apart by two oceans for the purpose of preserving the gift of freedom to mankind. He believed America was a light on a hill of which the Messiah spoke of in regards to the people of God (Matthew 5:14). Amazingly, the Lord promised David that there would be a time in which His people would dwell safely in a land in freedom. This promise to David came at a point in time in which Israel was already dwelling safely and in freedom, but God gave David a promise of another time and place.
2 Samuel 7:8 Now therefore so shalt thou say unto my servant David, Thus saith the LORD of hosts, I took thee from the sheepcote, from following the sheep, to be ruler over my people, over Israel:
2 Samuel 7:9 And I was with thee whithersoever thou wentest, and have cut off all thine enemies out of thy sight, and have made thee a great name, like unto the name of the great men that are in the earth.
2 Samuel 7:10 Moreover I will appoint a place for my people Israel, and will plant them, that they may dwell in a place of their own, and move no more; neither shall the children of wickedness afflict them any more, as beforetime,
In an address at the Annual Convention of the National Religious Broadcasters in 1983, Reagan displayed his understanding that America being a “shining city on a hill” was based upon the teachings of Jesus Christ.
“Think of it: the most awesome military machine in history, but it is no match for that one, single man, hero, strong yet tender, Prince of Peace. His name alone, Jesus, can lift our hearts, soothe our sorrows, heal our wounds, and drive away our fears. He gave us love and forgiveness. He taught us truth and left us hope. In the Book of John is the promise that we all go by — tells us that ‘For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life.’
With His message and with your conviction and commitment, we can still move mountains. We can work to reach our dreams and to make America a shining city on a hill. Before I say goodby, I wanted to leave with you these words from an old Netherlands folk song, because they made me think of our meeting here today:
We gather together to ask the Lord’s blessing.
We all do extol Thee, Thou leader triumphant
And pray that Thou still our Defender wilt be.
Let Thy congregation escape tribulation.
Thy name be ever praised! O Lord, make us free!
To which I would only add a line from another song: America, America, God shed His grace on thee.” {At the Annual Convention of the National Religious Broadcasters 1/31/1983}
Reagan understood the concept of the Declaration of Independence being associated with the Gospel.
“It’s not good enough to have equal access to our law; we must also have equal access to the higher law – the law of God. George Washington warned that morality could not prevail in exclusion of religious principles. And Jefferson asked, ‘Can the liberties of a nation be thought secure, when we’ve removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of people that these liberties are the gifts of God?’ We must preserve the noble promise of the American dream for every man, woman, and child in this land. And make no mistake, we can preserve it, and we will. That promise was not created by America. It was given to America as a gift from a loving God – a gift proudly recognized by the language of liberty in the world’s greatest charters of freedom: our Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights.” {At the Annual Meeting of the American Bar Association 8/1/1983}
Ronald’s Reagan’s time as President and the change in which was seen in the political atmosphere of America was known as the ‘Reagan Revolution.’ The Reagan Revolution came forth from Ronald Reagan’s Libertarian message that changed the ideology of the Republican party. Reagan preached a message of returning to the days of the Founders, a message of limited government, freedom, love of God and neighbor. These were the principles upon which this nation was founded, and the same principles which the Founders declared must be adhered to if the system of government they gave to their children would endure.
“The past few days when I’ve been at that window upstairs, I’ve thought a bit of the ‘shining city upon a hill.’ The phrase comes from John Winthrop, who wrote it to describe the America he imagined. What he imagined was important because he was an early Pilgrim, an early freedom man. He journeyed here on what today we’d call a little wooden boat; and like the other Pilgrims, he was looking for a home that would be free.
I’ve spoken of the shining city all my political life, but I don’t know if I ever quite communicated what I saw when I said it. But in my mind it was a tall, proud city built on rocks stronger than oceans, windswept, God-blessed, and teeming with people of all kinds living in harmony and peace; a city with free ports that hummed with commerce and creativity. And if there had to be city walls, the walls had doors and the doors were open to anyone with the will and the heart to get here. That’s how I saw it, and see it still.” {Farewell Address to the Nation 1/11/1989}
“At every crucial turning point in our history Americans have faced and overcome great odds, strengthened by spiritual faith. The Plymouth settlers triumphed over hunger, disease, and a cruel Northern wilderness because, in the words of William Bradford, ‘They knew they were Pilgrims, so they committed themselves to the will of God and resolved to proceed.’ George Washington knelt in prayer at Valley Forge and in the darkest days of our struggle for independence said that ‘the fate of unborn millions will now depend, under God, on the courage and conduct of this army.’ Thomas Jefferson, perhaps the wisest of our founding fathers, had no doubt about the source from which our cause was derived. ‘The God who gave us life,’ he declared,’ gave us liberty.’ And nearly a century later, in the midst of a tragic and at times seemingly hopeless Civil War, Abraham Lincoln vowed that ‘this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom.’” {Radio Address to the Nation 9/18/1982}
Reagan attributed his message of freedom to the law of God.
“Freedom prospers when religion is vibrant and the rule of law under God is acknowledged.” {Ronald Reagan “Evil Empire” Speech 8/3/1983}
The Reagan Revolution was in reality a desire to return to the days of the Founders. The days of the Founders were a picture of the beginning of Creation and the Paradisaical state which existed where man could walk with God. David was a type of Adam who walked in close relationship with God (1 Samuel 2:35; 1 Kings 3:14; 8:25; 9:4; 2 Chronicles 6:16; 7:17; Psalm 116:9), a foreshadowing of Messiah (Ezekiel 34:23-25; Isaiah 11:1; 55:3-4; Jeremiah 23:4-6; 30:9; Hosea 3:5; Revelation 22:16).
As with Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan’s popularity has greatly increased after his Presidency. This parallels King David, whose reign as king was not as important as the promises given him of Messiah, the Prince of Peace that would come from his lineage (Psalm 72:1-17; 45:1-17; Jeremiah 23:5-6; 33:15; Isaiah 9:7; 11:1-5; 40:10-11; Zechariah 9:9; Daniel 9:24; Luke 1:32; Acts 2:30; Hebrews 1:8-9).
For more on the parable of the Presidents Code:
Following is a ‘chart’ which gives a quick synopsis of the Presidents Code:
George Washington The Garden planted Genesis 2
John Adams Adam in the Garden Genesis 2
Thomas Jefferson Serpent in the Garden Genesis 3
James Madison Seed of Woman vs. The serpent Genesis 3
James Monroe War between the seeds Genesis 3
John Quincy Adams War won by the Seed of woman Genesis 3
Andrew Jackson Victory of the Promised Seed Genesis 3
Martin Van Buren Cain, Abel & Seth Genesis 4
William Henry Harrison Days of Noah Genesis 6
John Tyler The ark of Noah Genesis 6-7
James Polk Mountains of Ararat, Noah’s vineyard Genesis 8-9
Zachary Taylor Covenant with Noah and his vineyard Genesis 8-9
Millard Fillmore Blessing of Shem, curse of Canaan Genesis 9
Franklin Pierce The Blessing of Shem Genesis 9
James Buchanan Nimrod and the Tower of Babel Genesis 10-11
Abraham Lincoln Abraham Genesis 12-21
Andrew Johnson Isaac Genesis 22
Ulysses S. Grant Jacob & Esau Genesis 25-28
Rutherford B. Hayes Jacob flees Genesis 29
James A. Garfield Jacob and Laban Genesis 29-31
Chester A. Arthur Jacob returning to Canaan Genesis 30-32
Grover Cleveland Jacob & the Angel Genesis 32
Benjamin Harrison Israel & Shechem Genesis 33-35
Grover Cleveland (2) Covenant between God and Jacob Genesis 35
William McKinley Joseph and his brothers Genesis 37
Theodore Roosevelt Joseph in Egypt Genesis 39-41
William Howard Taft Joseph’s in prison, exalted Genesis 39-47
Woodrow Wilson Joseph ruler of Egypt Genesis 41-50
Warren G. Harding Israel dwelling in Goshen Genesis 46-50
Calvin Coolidge Joseph & Israel in Egypt Genesis 50-Exodus 1
Herbert Hoover Joseph & Israel in Egypt Genesis 50-Exodus 1
Franklin D. Roosevelt Pharaoh & Moses Exodus 1-2
Harry S. Truman Deliverance from Egypt Exodus 1-19
Dwight D. Eisenhower Israel at Mt. Sinai Exodus 17-20
John F. Kennedy The 2nd Generation of Israel Numbers 20-36
Lyndon B. Johnson The book of Deuteronomy Deuteronomy 1-34
Richard Nixon Joshua and the Judges Joshua – 1 Samuel 2
Gerald Ford Samuel, Saul & David 1 Samuel 1-25
Jimmy Carter The struggles of David 1Samuel 16 – 2Samuel 24
Ronald Reagan King David 1 & 2 Samuel
George H.W. Bush Solomon 1 Kings 1-11
Bill Clinton Kings, Ezra & Nehemiah 1 & 2 Kings – Nehemiah
George W. Bush The Second Temple period Ezra – Malachi
Barack Obama The days of Jesus Matthew
Donald Trump Battle between Christ and Jewish leadership/the Crucifixion Matthew
Joe Biden End of Matthew to the beginning of Mark Matthew-Mark
Donald Trump (2) Death & Resurrection of Christ to His Advent Matthew – Mark
littleguyintheeye@gmail.com
Little Guy in the Eye 